Damn now I have to boycott an entire video connector.

    • jackalope@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Why?

      I’ve never understood the difference other than I get the vague sense display port is associated with apple.

      • WolfLink@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        64
        ·
        1 year ago

        DisplayPort is designed to give your GPU a fast connection to your display. HDMI is designed to give the copyright holder of the video you are watching a DRM protected connection to your display to make piracy harder.

        This is why DisplayPort is better for the consumer but HDMI is more popular because the device manufacturers are really in charge of what you get.

        • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          1 year ago

          HDMI is designed to give the copyright holder of the video you are watching a DRM protected connection

          Care to explain how one feature added years in defines what the entire thing is “designed for”? HDMI had nothing related to drm for several years

      • PeterPoopshit@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        The only disadvantage of display port that I can think of is that it’s harder to find capture devices (or at least Linux compatible ones) that have display port. Generally no one cares about that stuff though. I use capture cards because I sometimes do stuff involving other computers and it’s 1000 times more convenient to have a vlc window floating around with the display output.

        No one seems to have this use case besides me, I’m just glad that there exist capture cards fast enough to do playback in real-time and not a 5 second delay. I don’t stream.

      • Nevrome@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        Français
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        Me neither. I play at 1440p/120hz. Both cables can manage that resolution and frame rate.

        The only difference I get is when I use DisplayPort and leave my computer alone for 20 mins, the GPU goes to sleep and the monitor won’t display anything although I hear background apps/games running.

        Without changing any settings, using a HDMI cable solved that.

        HDMI it is.

        • WolfLink@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Even if HDMI manages the same framerate it will still have a higher latency.

        • Uninvited Guest@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          In a multi monitor set up, when a screen connected to display port goes to sleep my computer treats it like that screen was disconnected - meaning all my open applications get shoved from one screen to another. I’ve also used HDMI to avoid that.

          • midori@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Ugh, so THAT’S why it happens? It’s quite irritating, and only rebooting seems to fix it.