Oxymoron of the century.
As far as I’m concerned the best way of making smart glasses with a focus on privacy is to not make them at all. Or at least don’t stick a camera on it.
I like the concept of having a display in your glasses. I just don’t fathom why would you also put a camera on them.
Without the camera, it IS just… Glasses.
with focus on privacy
“We, and our 2974 partners care about your privacy so we made this new spy device”
Go fuck yourself, Apple.
It’s all about redefining terms.
“You give your data to us. All of them, of course. Because, what else. When we have all your data, then we are able to protect your data better than you are. This is called data privacy”
we are able to protect your data better than you are.
Definitely, because they have rules and procedures on how to protect your data, and a price that their trusted partners must pay to get it.
And you? you are so fucking irresponsible with your data, that you gave it to a huge corporation! For free!
That alone is enough to discredit your ability to protect your data!
Guys, check it out! I did it! Privacy respecting smartglasses!
Did they mention if they were focusing on preserving or destroying privacy?
They are “creating” it.
Be positive, dammit!
/s
Apple really does like inventing things that already exist.
Now tinted, to protect the users privacy!
Companies seem to catch up. It’s a new bait. 🤭
- Ugh… they now want privacy. Calling the Marketing team. 🤭
If the 2027 AirPods and AI pin/pendant, both expected to come with cameras (or at least an optimally placed microphone bug), are anything to go by: “the cameras … are not designed for taking photos and videos, and will instead send information about the wearer’s surroundings [including any others in it] to Siri.”
Phew… I’m soo relieved the data is just being fed straight to Siri.
man - hope this doesn’t come true - we don’t need this slop
Motherfuckers
First apple tag, now this. Apple must really love the creepy stalkers they cater to.
