• Pollo_Jack@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    He could by getting all conservatives out of policy making positions, but he is too much of a bitch to do it.

  • leanleft@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 days ago

    the article seems pretty partisan and populist. selectively chooses facts for discredit while omitting any admission of credibility. does not address the problems or issues with a proposed solution. lots of suspicion, unfair assumptions about motives, and irrelevantly keeps tieing back to the trump administration. the highly partisan angle seems to discredit arstechnica as an intelligent unpreferential information source for productive discussion.

  • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    8 days ago

    Soooo, he’s going to use tax payer dollars to fund Christian science reading rooms across the nation?

  • _Nemo_@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    8 days ago

    …by axing or redirecting (read: embezzling) funds once spent on actual science?

  • villainy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    8 days ago

    This is just a euphemism for alchemy isn’t it. He’s going to dump billions of taxpayer dollars into a quest to turn lead into gold.

  • db2@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    8 days ago

    Only if the word is redefined to mean “shitting your diaper and lying about it”.

  • tidderuuf@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    8 days ago

    This coming from the same guy who was confused about what happens with magnets just a few months ago and now he tells people in order to make money you “do magnets”.

    A real golden shower of wisdom from that bag.