• Buffalox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    Not gonna happen anytime soon.
    And there is no majority for it in UK when the reality of rejoining is explained.

    1. Give up the British pound and switch to Euro.
    2. Pay full price, the old discount membership is not an option.
    3. Dismantle FPP elections and House of lords which are both utterly undemocratic, and cause political instability.
    4. Being willing to allow EU to become even tighter (may imply giving up an additional bit of sovereignty) to be able to work with more new member states, and avoid a Hungary situation in the future.

    There is a majority in general that is for reentering, but when the above points are stated, support in the general population drops to about 13%!!

    It’s probably higher among younger people, but without mentioning the above points, no poll on reentering is worth anything, because they are polling a pipedream.

      • Buffalox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 days ago

        As things are going it is not impossible. But Canada still rely on USA as their most significant trading partner, and EU membership would dramatically complicate that relationship.

        • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 days ago

          EU membership would dramatically complicate that relationship.

          Threatening to annex Canada and economically attacking dramatically complicated that relationship.

    • Squizzy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 days ago

      Point 4 has something in the works for 65% of countries representing 75% of the population or something like that. Unanimity is difficult with growing pools.

      The other three are chefs kiss though.

      • Buffalox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 days ago

        The problem is that we need a mechanism to stop a single country to hold back all of EU for years.
        I think most agree on that. Problem is that it probably requires to take a way a bit of sovereignty to achieve that.
        So it has to be done very carefully, to protect the rights of individual countries.
        As it is it has worked extremely well, except for the situation with Hungary that were traitors within EU that supported Russia over EU.

    • NewNewAccount@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 days ago

      The EU requires its members to abandon FPtP elections? Is that for all electable branches of government? That’s awesome.

      • Buffalox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        IDK if there are situations where it’s not as bad as in UK. If the position has limited power, it may not be an issue. But in UK it’s not just the government, it’s the entire parliament, meaning it is crippling the opposition that is the main check on the government, and creating governments that have a vast majority, so even if some of their own don’t follow the party line, they can press things through with majority anyway.
        I have only heard it mentioned specifically regarding UK parliament.

    • Kissaki@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      Why would the UK have to give up the pound for Euro? Isn’t the political institution still different from the Euro collective (or however it’s called in EN)?

      • Buffalox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        All new member states must join the Eurozone once they meet the economic convergence criteria.
        That’s the rules.

  • JensSpahnpasta@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    I really think that it’s time to stop bashing the Brits. Esp. those younger brits. There are many Pro-Europeans who got totally fucked by the older generation. Many of those older Pro-Brexit voters do not have to deal with border controls and bad job prospects, because they are dead. No one who is currently under 28 was even allowed to vote.

    So stop the senseless bashing and let’s try to work together to bring the UK back.

    • Kjell@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      When is the plot from? It would be interesting to compare one plot from 10 years ago with one plot from today to see if the numbers in favour of EU is increasing in the middle age groups as the young people becomes middle aged or if people are losing faith in EU as they grew older.

      Edit: okay, since it says leave and remain it has to be from 10 years ago.

      • JensSpahnpasta@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Edit: okay, since it says leave and remain it has to be from 10 years ago.

        Yes, it’s an exit poll from the Brexit vote

    • Squizzy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 days ago

      They need to take the euro and move to pr-st voting.

      They had a great deal and fucked it, letting them inwith Farage athe door is disrespectful to us in europe.

  • eicker@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 days ago

    Brexit is turning into one of those rare political decisions where the people who will live with the consequences the longest were mostly too young to vote on it. Whether rejoining happens or not, the generational divide on Europe’s future is becoming impossible to ignore.

  • DupaCycki@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    4 days ago

    Sadly, it’ll take years for the UK to rejon the EU, and only if there’s a government that actually wants it too.

    There are unbelievable levels of bureaucracy in the entire process. Tons of topics to negotiate, requirements to meet and verify.

    There’s at least one country that will become a new EU member before the UK rejoins. Possibly 2 or 3, depending on how the others do.

    It’s just sad how much time and resources were wasted because of this idiotic move. So many Brits could be living considerably better lives, but instead they have to deal with this shit for like 20-30 years in total. But hey, the politicians got their votes, ruled the country for a while, and they’re set for life.

    • Eximius@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      Decades*

      That’s how long it takes.

      Not only would UK not get any special deal, but they would have to align in terms of anti-corruption, monetary policy, infrastructure, health, food, commodity, energy sector planning.

      • CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        Facilitating corruption is the biggest single component of the UK economy, ain’t no way its ever meeting those requirements.

      • DupaCycki@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 days ago

        Very true. It’d have to completely revise most of its policies. As an existing member, it could have negotiated special terms or just stalled, but as a candidate, it has to follow requirements to the letter.

        Kind of like an existing employee at a company can slack off or make silly mistakes, but a candidate on an interview cannot, because they just won’t get accepted.

    • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      Not completely true, they were immune to a lot of continental issues so they could just wait until they were ready and Europe (mostly France) wasn’t. They could have a non interference policy anytime something went wrong. (see 1930s)