• Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    17 hours ago

    In any next generation of cell phone networks, the providers should be forced to fill up all blind spots on the network with the new technology before they are allowed to upgrade existing networks.

  • BlackLaZoR@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    14 hours ago

    5G was a scam. Promises were impossible to fulfill and investment forums were full of paid shills propping up the telcom stocks. In reality 5G has the exact same throughput as 4G. Nothing changed

    • jimmy90@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      I wonder if the people has believed the 5g conspiracy fantasies feel remotely foolish

      Obviously are intellectually and or mentally diverse so maybe this was just one more inevitable step to total downfall

    • python@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      22 hours ago

      We should follow in the footsteps of many tech companies and stop numbering the Gs in favour of tagging on the year they were launched. So next year we wouldn’t get 6G, we would get G2027. Sounds much cooler, doesn’t it?

  • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    None of this makes sense!

    With 3G, we had clearly defined speeds, and what constitutes 3G.

    4G mostly defined itself, but it left a bit of grey area.

    Then 5G was posting speeds slower than 4G’s top speed. There was never a defined speed range. The term 5G is nothing more than marketing. It means nothing.

    I haven’t even heard of 6G, but given how shit 5G’s handling went right from the start, I assume 6G has to be inserted anally.

    • njordomir@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      Yes, also, it should be criminal for home internet providers and phone service providers to conflate, directly or by implication, the “G” in 5G (fifth generation) and the “G” in 10G (ten gigabit).

      I saw a commercial one day that went something like “Our competitors only have 1G; we have 5G. Don’t you want to have the most Gs? We have the best Gs, no one has Gs like us. Don’t settle for inferior Gs, call today!”

      I remember commenting on the switch from 3g to 4g back around 2009 or so and they were already being deceptive in a lot of ways back then. Telecommunications has been a cesspool for decades.

      • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        “Our competitors only have 1G; we have 5G. Don’t you want to have the most Gs? We have the best Gs, no one has Gs like us. Don’t settle for inferior Gs, call today!”

        Sounds like a commercial for that trump phone.

    • just_another_person@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      5G was mostly about cramming more connections into the spectrum and expanding broadcast range (as well as some other things), but it wasn’t just about node speed on the network.

      • Glitchvid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        2 days ago

        And it ended up posting significantly faster speeds in dense areas where they actually deploy the technology. My phone has hit 4Gb/s on it.

    • kewjo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      5g is rebranded 4g during the rollout for 4g most providers couldn’t hit the bandwidth targets so they branded things 4g LTE or 4g+ to denote it wasn’t actual 4g. when they caught up and could actually support 4g they realized everyone thought lte or + were better because of course more things = better so they just changed it to 5g

    • Brkdncr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 days ago

      I hate to tell you this, but 3G was a lie too. 3g should have been good to 100mbps.