No, but their uptime is a lot better than most. A lot of companies would have monthly outages just for patching before they moved to massively scaled hosted services.
Remember when BlackBerry would have an outage maybe once a year and everyone complained?
Can’t. It’s an arms race.
Moving to Nutanix soon. Love their product. Proxmox looks good on paper too, just not mature enough in the enterprise to bet my paycheck on it.
Cloud infrastructure is expensive.
Source?
Option 3: companies that you pay to provide authentication service. Regulated so that they clearly tell you if they are subsidizing service outside of your payments.
We nearly already do this with certificate services and they would probably be in a good position to offer an id service.
That’s really too bad. Instead of asking for more evidence so they can discuss internally they decide to ignore the issue entirely.
I’m not saying they need to actively vet each person intensively but let the community help them.
Most firewalls where you’re trying to get around it will simply block quic.
This is probably the biggest hack of the year. As of the writing it had infected 140+ packages including some from big names like CrowdStrike. npm is in a LOT of things, and this thing is a true worm.
I still need internet service and the iPod touch was discontinued years ago.
Who even makes phone calls today? Not me. I need a device that does everything but phone calls more than I need a device that only does voice.
I can see this being multi player
You can’t maintain security and feature changes separately long term.
Let’s look at your code from 20+ years ago?
No one remembers how vulnerable windows server and windows desktop OS’s were before they revamped updates?
Forced updates are great. The internet is safer.
Sounds like shit drives are half of the problem?
One extreme defensive move for an enterprise would be to implement full redundancy for anything not hosted on-premises. Redundancy for data protection is relatively straightforward, but having multiple email, supply chain, or e-commerce services is very expensive and disruptive. What are the odds that it would even be needed? Whatever those odds were, they just became much higher.
This is simply dumb. The odds are greater than zero. you must have a disaster plan. It sucks that MS did this but I don’t have much sympathy for anyone that decided to save money by ignoring DR.
A long time ago I did some work that involved apple v Samsung and they were pretty strict about even showing a dev device over a voip call.
Exterior window blinds had to be shut, screens set up on the interior so you couldn’t see through the doors, no recording devices, legal representation on-site to verify.
Tech archeology like this is pretty neat.
Probably not AWS directly, just services on AWS that are also tied into azure. Quite the impressive failure domain.