A new law will ban retailers from using shoppers’ personal data to hike grocery prices—but consumer advocates warn it contains loopholes that companies could exploit.
I await the inevitable Republican backed federal law that preempts state laws and makes it legal except under a very narrow case that somehow would be beneficial to consumers.
We must do it.
For the children.
Companies just have way too much data about people.
It should be illegal to store/compile data that isn’t directly related to the good, services or products that you’re offering.
We’re getting to the point where everything about you, down to your real-time location, is available to anyone with enough money. That’s just not a power that we should allow to go unregulated.
all companies are in the data business now. that IS the business.
i told a friend maybe 2 years ago that mcdonalds app and changing to digital drive thru menus would mean they could change prices at any time and even per customer. he thought it would be “too difficult”
he thought it would be “too difficult”
A lot of people’s reluctance to focus on privacy is because they don’t understand the scale of the problem or the downstream consequences.
That isn’t too surprising, it’s an incredibly complex topic and the companies that benefit from our collective ignorance go out of their way to gaslight everyone.
They don’t call it a ‘We’re stealing all of you data’ disclosure they call it a ‘Privacy Notice’. They announce that they’ve added the option to opt-out (a Dark Pattern) of some new privacy destroying feature instead of announcing the privacy destroying feature. Bit by bit, people are bombarded with a bunch of messaging that makes them think that companies are looking to protect your privacy.
“Your privacy is valuable to us” is probably the most honest thing they say, it is incredibly valuable… many hundreds of billions of dollars worth of value.
This is the real crux of the issue. Data collection and algorithmic incentives are destroying society.
You… eh… what?
How is this even a thing? What kind of hellhole do you poor us-americans live in?
you know they just copy airlines, right?
Canada needs this. Also either a full fucking ban on the remote-updated epaper price tags, or at the least very strict rules on when they can be updated (i.e. once a day before opening or after closing to the public)
And 24 hour stores can update their prices at midnight, but the lower of the two prices is still effective for the first 2 hours, in case anyone was actively shopping during the change.
Let’s ban other theoretical concepts as well! /s The simple solution is to bring back cost accounting and make it transparent. A system where everything needs to be kept secret to fleece the masses is not a system I’d want to support in my country (but look…here we are).
Wtf is that shit even.
Imagine having to hire someone who gets lower prices to do your shopping.
- big grocery state lobbying intensifies. . .
I live in MD. I dont know how this affects me since I dont mobile order anything, but the precedent sounds good to set
Surveillance pricing usually makes people think per-person pricing, but the law goes further than just that.
I worked on an electronic shelf label project at a (now defunct) retail project. I’m less worried about them trying to target prices per user while in a store because there are some difficult hardware and software challenges trying to show a price to one person (like what if two people are looking at it.) Showing a per-user price per app is trivial. There’s also laws in most states that require you to pay the price shown on the price tag and trying to target per person risks failing that, though that depends on state enforcement. The system I worked at linked the prices to the point of sale system to ensure you paid the lowest price shown on any price tag in the last few hours (though that was company policy to make complying with the law easier.)
What I am worried about is prices dynamically changing based micro trends like water getting more expensive on warm days. Some people might say that increase prices means increased supply to meet that demand, the real risk is retailers being able to micro optimize prices to better capture consumer surplus as profits. A consumer is un-prepared for that and the consumer will not benefit.
Who wrote the law in the first place? That should tell you enough.
I don’t even get how it would work in practice. If me and another person are staring at the price tag of a block of cheese, and I’m rich and they’re not, does it laser beam a price into my eyeballs and a different, lower price into theirs? Cause otherwise when I take the block of cheese to the register and suddenly it’s double the price, I’m putting the cheese back cause I saw the lower price.
