• Zwuzelmaus@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    a cyclist in San Francisco sued the Google-owned company after she was seriously injured when one of the brand’s driverless taxis stopped in a cycle lane and a passenger opened its back door, striking the cyclist

    Well, in Germany the cyclists would have the law 100% on their side and win every case.

    is “normal practice” for the autonomous vehicles

    And if it is done deliberately (repeatedly), then the car’s operator is in the area of criminal law.

    • Don Piano@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      Well, in Germany the cyclists would have the law 100% on their side and win every case.

      Law on their side: probably Winning cases: aus Mangel öffentlichen Interesses eingestellt…

  • skami@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    Just like how youtuber “not just bikes” said it would be, cities would be much better improving public transportation than complying with whatever big tech companies tell em to do

  • Jhex@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    4 days ago

    I hope the reply from Europe was rolling on the floor laughing at Waymo as they pointed them back to Murica with their shitty tech

  • InFerNo@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    4 days ago

    So at this moment these taxis has drivers, but eventually they will be driverless and be priced “competitively, but premium”. They cut out the driver’s wagen and charge more?

  • Gladaed@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    4 days ago

    They are right in the sense that I expect other cab companies to do the same.

    You need to push against the industry, not be fueled by AI hate when an issue is mostly independent.