• slackj_87@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    105
    ·
    5 days ago

    Great… can’t wait for politicians to use this as a way to pass “common sense” legislation banning 3D printers.

  • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    63
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    Notably absent… the explosives.

    But sure, if you are wondering how folks out in Yemen or Gaza managed to retaliate against their oppressors for so long, this is a textbook example of how and why. What’s being proposed is collection of technology we’ve had since at least the 1960s that’s slowly made its way into civilian circulation.

    Also…

    Khojayev’s just-launched prototype has no effectiveness track record

    I mean, we’re seeing what “just-launched prototypes with no effective track record” have accomplished on the Ukraine-Russia front-lines and it’s a decidedly mixed bag.

    I think a harder question to answer is “Who would be interested in putting one of these into practical use?” And that gets to the real value-add of a Stinger MANPAD. Namely, the humans willing and practiced enough to use it.

    Also - and again, this cannot be overstated - the model above has no explosives installed. Idk how confident I’d be around one of these things if it was actually armed.

    • FauxLiving@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      It’s not a MANPAD really.

      The sensor package has no IR sensor (or radar unit) and no way to proximity fuse.

      It has GPS, accelerometer and barometric pressure. It’s more like a rocket powered artillery shell than an anti-air weapon.

      Or, given the lack of payload, it’s more like a high speed burrito delivery device.

    • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      5 days ago

      You can deploy a lot of $96 semi-effective hardware and improve it vs something that might be thousands or even tens or hundreds of thousands to deploy.

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        You can deploy a lot of $96 semi-effective hardware

        Khojayev’s just-launched prototype has no effectiveness track record

        :-/

        I mean, time will tell. To date, this particular iteration of technology has a 0% success rate in doing anything but farming clicks.

    • Riskable@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      5 days ago

      You don’t need explosives. It has a spot in the front for a camera. One of the new microcontrollers with AI accelerators can do face recognition extremely quickly. It would be possible to use it as an assassination tool.

      Even if you changed nothing about the design, the speed and mass of the thing hitting a person in the face could kill.

      • chaogomu@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        5 days ago

        As the bps space YouTube channel has shown, reliability is paramount in any launch, especially a guided launch.

        That and people duck when shit flies at them, unless it’s supersonic, which again, as bps space has shown, control of a supersonic flight is extremely difficult to get right.

        This is a guy who landed a hobby rocket like a tesla booster.

        But at $100 a pop, you could have backups. (or payloads)

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        It would be possible to use it as an assassination tool.

        Khojayev’s just-launched prototype has no effectiveness track record

        :-/

        I think

        it’s more like a high speed burrito delivery device.

        Is a more accurate assessment.

    • NotAnonymousAtAll@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 days ago

      Notably absent… the explosives.

      https://xkcd.com/651/

      Not my area of expertise, so please tell me if the idea is complete garbage. With that being said: Theoretically, could the LiPo Battery that’s already in there anyway be turned into an explosive payload by intentionally overheating and puncturing it on impact?

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 days ago

        Not my area of expertise, so please tell me if the idea is complete garbage.

        Turning a laptop battery into a weapon is a non-trivial endeavor. The absurdity of TSA was more their attempt to police based on weak science than the real danger of an airplane full of lithium battery powered devices.

        • NotAnonymousAtAll@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 days ago

          Not really an answer to you, just writing it here in case anyone else interested is still reading along:

          I looked up some numbers and apart from the practical challenges of making a battery “go boom” in a controlled way it seems like the energy density to even make this a hypothetical option just isn’t there. Even the best LiPo batteries don’t quite reach 1 MJ/kg while gunpowder has ~3 MJ/kg, and numbers only go up from there for more modern chemical explosives.

  • EightBitBlood@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    5 days ago

    Can’t wait for the next Luigi to use one of these on an Epstein CEO. Polymarket, please let me make that bet.

  • TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    Violence is only the last resort, but Americans should learn to make DIY weapons in case another civil war breaks out, because it is unlikely that Donald will concede power when the time comes.

    • Agent641@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      Let’s just remember the great lessons of history: Never cavalry charge a formed infantry, if the war involves Vietnam in ANY way, join the Vietnamese side, and halberds are the pinnacle of melee weapons.

  • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    This is the same kind of thing the local Airsofters were building with an arduino and a few hats a decade ago. It’s not a functional “weapon” it’s just a hobby rocket with fins (that admittedly looks real fun to shoot)

  • mbirth 🇬🇧@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    5 days ago

    “Do you have natural freckles or did you use that shoulder-mounted guided missile prototype again?”

  • circuscritic@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    5 days ago

    That’s fucking nuts.

    I have a lot of thoughts, but all I can really say is that’s fucking nuts.

  • Gammelfisch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    5 days ago

    Damn and the Dept of Fucked Up Wars pays $1 to 1.3 million for a Tomahawk cruise missile. I am fully aware MANPADS are much smaller.

    The article below the DIY MANPADs was interesting too. MIT researchers used a 3D printer to build an electric motor!