Mercedes-Benz debuts turquoise exterior lights to indicate the car is self-driving | A visual indicator for other drivers::undefined

    • Otter@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      59
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Eh, it’s probably good to have regardless?

      It’s less about being careful around the car and more about how you might interact with it. For example, honking the horn or flashing your beams wouldn’t have the same effect. On that note, it might be nice to have some way of telling a self driving car to temporarily use elevated sensors or something, the same way a horn tells a driver that something is wrong. As long as there’s a way to prevent abuse of the system

      I don’t know much about these lights, but we COULD use some new standards in general with how many things have changed with cars in recent years. Brake lights on electric vehicles being another thing to consider.

      That “gentle horn” everyone wants being another

      • Synthead@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        You’re still the driver in the self-driving car. If someone honks, you have pedals and a wheel in front of you. It always comes down to driver neglect. It’s like blaming the cruise control for speeding, but giving cruise control more responsibilities.

        • Otter@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 years ago

          The standard should endure past this stage. It’s not necessary now, but it would be good to start getting used to some kind of a symbol now

          Eventually when cars move past this stage, then we’ll need it

    • Kbobabob@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      warning lights

      Lol, this is like calling the turn signals warning lights. Letting others know something about your driving isn’t a warning, it’s just an indicator.

    • Postcard64@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      2 years ago

      To play the devil’s advocate: early cars needed a guy with a flag im front of them because people were used to horses and carriages and not automobiles. After a while that stopped being a thing.

      But yeah, self driving cars are not really ready.

    • kuneho@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      🤦

      if we need warning lights for ANYTHING, the humanity is just not ready.

  • adaveinthelife@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    2 years ago

    Just seeing a turn signal on a Mercedes or BMW is enough for me to assume the driver isn’t the one in control.

  • AA5B@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Seems like a bad idea - you know someone is going to figure out how to take advantage of that.

    • Scofflaw - ai has no pride or ego so I can cut them off at will and they will always back down
    • scammer - manufacturer has deep pockets - where’s my neck brace?
  • mlg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    Do the same thing, but hook it up to a camera that detects if your eyes are on the road lol.

    • froh42@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      The reason for these lights is that Mercedes has Level 3 autonomy, so the car can self drive without the driver taking attention - for example here in Germany it is illegal (and there are photo traps) to use your phone on while driving. The lights are a solution to the exemption that you are allowed to use your phone while your car is on Level 3 autonomy.

      On level 3 you need to be able to take over again within 30 seconds after the car actively asks you to do so.

    • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      … the ticket would still exist. Are you thinking you would be able to send it to your car manufacturer so they can look into what happened?

  • feecoomeeq@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    2 years ago

    I think it would be also cool to have an indicator if the car in front of you has cruise control on

    • Grimy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 years ago

      That would be great for the driver himself. The amount of times I’ve had to play leap frogs with someone only to be given a dirty look when hes the one that constantly slows down and accelerates.

  • ULS@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 years ago

    Watch this turn into a status thing that starts trending.

    • Epzillon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 years ago

      As someone living in a country which haven’t seen any self-driving cars I’d just be a lot more cautious/careful if I’d ever get close to anything with those lights.

      • Knocturnal@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        AI with all those sensors prob drives better than many city drivers I interact daily changing lanes and doing parallel parking.

        • Maggoty@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          California has had several high profile problems with self driving cars. This is going to be a disaster, physically and politically. This is literally just rich people buying a legal defense for hitting pedestrians. There’s going to be outrage the first time it happens and it turns out the driver wasn’t even looking at the road, or was drunk.

          • Knocturnal@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            Ofc there are gonna be issues but I kinda asume drunk driver and person who lack observation has lower chance of hitting someone with car that has any kind of assistance. There are prob more times driving assistance helped than caused problem.

            • Maggoty@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 years ago

              Sure, but that shouldn’t absolve them of responsibility. They should still be required to pay attention and apply the brakes or take control if required. These systems do not have a 100 percent safety record. So to say we don’t need the human as a check anymore is bonkers.

        • danque@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 years ago

          And don’t forget the human panic response. One of my primary reasons to only allow ai driving. People that kick on the gas in an emergency situation should not be allowed to drive ever, unless hitting the gas was the right choice of course. But seeing people not stop but hit the gas in a panic is the worst thing to see happening.

          • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 years ago

            Years ago (maybe 2009ish) my mother got rear ended 4-5 times by the same person at a red light. They hit her, and kept accidentally hitting the gas instead of the brake over and over. It probably happens more often than we think… but there will always be people lying to themselves and others that they are good drivers.

    • Gestrid@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 years ago

      “I have the turquoise checkmark light on my car, and you don’t.”

  • I_Miss_Daniel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    This could be useful as a communication medium where the car transmits data through the light to the neighbours.

    • el_abuelo@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      If only there was some kind of universal communication technology that didn’t require line of sight, worked over distances out to say 100m and was reasonably inexpensive to implement…then we wouldn’t need to communicate using the modern equivalent of semaphore.

  • LazaroFilm@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    Wow I’ve been thinking about that for a while now. We should be able to tell when someone is driving or an Ai is.

  • Maggoty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    2 years ago

    And I live in California. Of course we’re going to help rich people avoid all consequences of their actions. Because paying attention to where your 1 ton metal missile is going is too much to ask. But only if you can afford the turquoise lights.

    • mob@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 years ago

      I don’t think I understand how adding safety indicators to elevate awareness of self driving vehicles helps rich people avoid all consequence.

      As a poor person, I’d like to know if a car I’m driving by is self driving.

      • Maggoty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        2 years ago

        Mercedes is a luxury brand. And as the article states, in California and Nevada drivers will get a legal pass on distracted driving if the system and lights are on.

        So the drivers of these luxury cars are no longer responsible for what the car does.

        • mob@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          The article says they are allowed to test the new indicators in those States, not that they get a legal pass…

          In California, the permit will let Mercedes-Benz trial turquoise lights on test vehicles for two years. In Nevada, the automaker can start adding the feature to 2026 year production vehicles

          Do you think it’s a better scenario for less awareness of self driving cars? If self driving is part of the future, this seems like a reasonable step imo.

          • Maggoty@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            2 years ago

            Go read the article again then. There’s a whole section about distracted driving.

            • mob@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              2 years ago

              Ive read those 7 paragraphs a couple times now, and I don’t see anything about getting a legal pass. Maybe you could quote it for me?

              I have missed things due to ads covering things up on mobile on the past.

              • Maggoty@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                2 years ago

                As a Level 3 system, the driver is permitted to take their hands off the wheel, their feet off the pedals, and divert their attention away from the road. Most other driving systems require you to keep your hands on the wheel and pay attention. With Drive Pilot engaged, users are free to browse the Internet or watch videos on the vehicle’s central display.

                To be fair I’ve had that happen with ads too and it’s infuriating.

                • mob@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  2 years ago

                  Oh my bad. I somehow thought you were implying the light was going to give them the pass… You are talking about self driving cars in general though.

                  That’s been a thing though, would you like that progress to stop? I guess /fuckcars is a real popular movement online so we can have different opinions on that.