The way I read the article, the “worth millions” is the sum of the ransom demand.

The funny part is that the exploit is in the “smart” contract, ya know the thing that the blockchain keeps secure by forbidding any updates or patches.

  • StupendousMan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    62
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Sounds like a great way to make an insurance claim on a bunch of NFTs worth “millions” that you could not convince anyone to buy.

    • Lanusensei87@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 years ago

      You very much do own an NFT you purchase, what you don’t own is the asset the NFT represents (the shitty RNG generated monkey for example).

    • force@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      You better quit yapping before I steal more of your bytes pal, it’ll be the biggest regret of your life

  • Aceticon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Another interpretation is that it’s all an insurance scam were something worthless is “stolen by hackers” and then claimed to be worth millions for the insurance claim.

    But surely nobody in the “well known as impeccably honest” NFT world would ever do something like that!

  • Cyber Yuki@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    2 years ago

    “Potential losses”. I get the feeling that NFT owners got bit by the same bug that bit RIAA executives.

  • Margot Robbie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    2 years ago

    One of the great thing about the AI revolution is that since generating infinite number of unique random (and commonly, bad) pictures of literally anything you can think of takes only seconds, the entire concept of NFT has become completely worthless as it completely destroyed the value-from-scarcity argument. Not that it ever was a good argument to begin with.

  • crashoverride@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    2 years ago

    Think of it like this, when people make drug busts and they find huge amounts of cocaine or whatever and they say oh this is 300 something mod a million is worth of stuff. No it’s not. It’s maybe like not even half that not even a quarter of that, they just make it up just to make their bust even bigger

    • Squizzy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 years ago

      I remember it used to be calculated on the lowest value extrapolated out so a gram of smoke was 20/25 bucks so a kilo of smoke “had a street value of 20,000 - 25,000.”

    • DerisionConsulting@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 years ago

      I also like the “10 Kilos of product was taken off of the street” which means like 12 grams of weed was turned into brownies

  • Etterra@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    2 years ago

    Just because the suckers that bought them paid millions doesn’t mean that the NFTs are worth millions.

    • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      And why should any sane person care if you did?

      It’s a digital file. Copies are exactly the same as the original.

  • Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    There were sufficiently stupid people to pay money for NFTs. They will sufficiently stupid people around to pay the ransom.

  • mhague@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    2 years ago

    People trying to discuss the topic have their posts pushed down while “lmao nfts” are voted up. How do you see someone saying, respectfully, “I think there’s a benefit to this.” and try to push down their contribution?

    Anyone who wants a good discussion about news in this community, must leave this community. If you want to add context or opposing perspectives, better go elsewhere. You build a community like this and you get people who know Hans had a vibrator, because jokes and legit opinions are treated as interchangable.