• micka190@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    71
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Damn, that guy’s fucking dumb lmao

    But also, is 7c/fakefilter even popular? It seems to barely have a following on GitHub to begin with. Seems pretty over the top to claim that PM and SL (and any other provider on that list) will get blocked from registering on websites.

  • tabular@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Sick of sites requiring an account, email or phone number. Makes the web even more unfriendly. I hope temporary emails can always get around filters, as if you play stupid games you should win stupid prices.

    • 𝐘Ⓞz҉@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 years ago

      Just keep using the temp emails and when they don’t recieve your email , call them up. Their IT support will unblock it after 50-100 calls. Remember consumers have the power.

    • uranibaba@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      I tried to report an issue in GitLab. I needed to input my phone number and payment information to create an account. WTF? No thanks, I’ll just not report the issue.

      • tabular@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        do you guys not have phones

        When buying stuff online I find 0101etc works. Public numbers used to work fine for other things but not so much these days. If that doesn’t work I usually don’t give a damn about the service at that point (e.g. ShatGPT) #TeamBots

        • uranibaba@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          I used to have a disposable phone number just for signing up but it was more trouble then it was worth. If the website is shady enough, I go look somewhere else.

    • Syrc@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Sick of sites requiring an account, email or phone number.

      Blame bots. The other day we had a post about how 70% of account creation processes on sites are started by bots. Imagine that if you didn’t even need confirmation.

      • tabular@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        What if account creation was local (e.g. Git and keys)?

        If no data needs to be stored then no account is needed. Use the system where there is a unique indentifier based on the password.

        • Syrc@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          Use the system where there is a unique indentifier based on the password.

          Never heard of this, how does that work?

          • tabular@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            A tripcode "is the hashed result of a password that allows one’s identity to be recognized without storing any data about users. Entering a particular password will let one “sign” one’s posts with the tripcode generated from that password. Trying to take another user’s tripcode and compute their password from it (for instance, to make posts that appear to come from a particular person) is somewhat computationally difficult."

            • Syrc@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 years ago

              That’s pretty cool, but still, does that really solve the bot problem? Doesn’t it make it easier for them to spam?

              • tabular@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 years ago

                Tripcodes doesn’t affect bots spamming at all.

                No longer needing accounts removes whatever barrier to entry email, phone or credit card is worth. On the plus side less people are being farmed for data, so society is better off 😕

                • Syrc@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  2 years ago

                  What I mean is, doesn’t that barrier being removed make things easier for bots as well? And while humans only save a bit of time once to register, bot farms would improve a lot considering they do it over and over again.

                  Less data farming is undeniably better, but imo if something helps bringing us further from the Dead Internet outcome I can accept it. Of course, just the bare necessities, sites that require you mail + phone + name and so on when they don’t need them to function should really dial it down.

  • ransomwarelettuce@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    ·
    2 years ago

    OK simplelogin you can make an argument there, very stupid one though.

    But protonmail and tutanota, wtf ?!?

    Just because an email provider is privacy focused and offers custom aliases means all it’s emails are spam ?

    Fuck this shit.

  • sir_reginald@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    55
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    the discussion is happening here: https://github.com/7c/fakefilter/issues/73

    Someone working at Proton has commented on the issue, the list maintainer wanted to take the discussion with proton private so we have only a few posts from them.

    If you want my personal take:

    It’s very clear how the list maintainer opposes anonymity in the internet in any form, which I see as an attack on freedom, journalism and activism.

    I’m not a fan of Protonmail of any sort and in fact I consider that their privacy is lacking… but I really hope they can talk some sense into this guy. This block list seems to be used by a lot of webs that will start blocking virtually every private email provider.

    (Edit: I assumed the person that posted the email list was a maintainer, but they don’t seem to have a “contributor” or “owner” badge, so idk. Maybe they are just very angry at privacy and anonymity on the internet)

    • just_another_person@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      2 years ago

      These lists are used by platforms to try and cut down on spam/bot account signups. This isn’t a thing done for signups by the vast majority of platforms out there, but the API verification steps IS becoming more prevalent I suppose. I just got rejected for using a Protonmail domain to buy something outright on a very popular pet supplies platform the other day, but…eh.

    • _number8_@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 years ago

      It’s very clear how the list maintainer opposes anonymity in the internet in any form,

      why would anyone ever be like this?

  • AMDIsOurLord@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    The one who opened an issue is either 13 years old and dumb as a log or a troll (also dumb as a log) and this project is barely used, like at all

    So please, don’t give them attention

  • Zak@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    2 years ago

    It appears that the Github user GalacticHypernova is not a contributor to the 7c/fakefilter project - just someone asking for some domains to be added. The current list does not contain proton.me or protonmail.com.

    I suppose this might be a reasonable litmus test for the reliability of that list.

  • kia@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    Why does anyone care? The npm package has 3,712 weekly downloads. They’re trying to act like it’s some mainstream package that a lot of companies rely on, but nobody uses it…

  • t0fr@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    2 years ago

    as someone who uses protonamil as my main email, this is very disappointing

  • DLSantini@lemmy.ml
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Funny, considering I’ve moved over to a paid proton account as my primary email, and my former primary email/Gmail account, with its ability to instantly become infinitely many disposable email addresses, is now used as exactly that. This same procedure occured many years ago, when I made my yahoo email into the disposable junk mail home, and my shiny new Gmail became my primary. I wonder how many years it be until proton becomes my disposable, and some as-of-yet to be created service becomes my new primary email. Or maybe email will finally be dead by then, and we’ll use something else entirely.

    I will say, even after all of these years, and using the living shit out of my Gmail account in many, many places, I still only get two or three spam emails at most during the entire year.

    • yamanii@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      When I was trying some gacha games out I tried using a disposable email but it wouldn’t let me.

  • dinckel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    2 years ago

    I’m really not a fan of heavy-handed approaches like this. I understand why most of the listed domains are on the proposed blocklist, but Tutanota and Proton are the two most common private email options. Rambler is a Russian news aggregate, so I’m not sure why that’s in the list, politics aside

  • 𝐘Ⓞz҉@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Yeap 83 businesses are my clients. If they do this ,guess they will never receive my email. Poor IT support of all the businesses. RIP

  • tinkeringidiot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    2 years ago

    That’s…a good portion of the free email providers on the planet. Even if companies are using this list as a filter for signups, it’s only going to be for a limited time.

    Companies want new accounts. They don’t mind very much if those accounts are fake - big numbers get investor attention. It only takes a handful of support cases with “I tried to register but it says my email address isn’t allowed” before the C-suite makes it clear to IT that this filter is no longer in sync with the corporate strategy.