• gian
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Which is why they’re currently not very good, yes.

    They are not very good because the only way to make them work is to adopt a “white list” approach: you don’t list what you ban but only what you allow. But that way make basically every phone/tablet basically useless outside very specific situations. If you simply ban a site, the same site will come up with another name, and another, and another… (and it work also for IPs)

    Mandating them by law would probably speed up development,

    Not really sure about that.

    and either way, you’re trying to thwart most kids/teenagers, not professional hackers.

    And here, while you are right about the idea, you are wrong about how it will end.

    It doesn’t really matter if a couple of kids can circumvent it if the methods are too difficult for the type of kids who barely even know how to use a PC, which seems to be most of them nowadays. Plus, many kids aren’t actually willing to break the law just to access TikTok.

    Point is that after a couple of kids circumvent it does not matter if the methods are difficult or not, they will be passed to other kids, I’ve seen this too many times to be so naive to not understand that with law mandated filters it would not happen.
    Granted, maybe some kids will not try it, but these kids are the one who would not open a social network profile if their parent say them to not do it.