• HiramFromTheChi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      4 months ago

      And this is usually because we measure intelligence by our own standards, rather than theirs.

      “What’s normal to the spider is not normal to the fly.”

  • Archangel1313@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    4 months ago

    This is just dumb. Of course cows use tools. There’s a small dairy farm near where I live, that has an automatic milking station in one end of the barn. Whenever one of the cows feels like their udder is too full, they just walk into the station, and it clips onto them and starts milking.

    They aren’t stupid. They know what it is, and what it does…and they use it. Consciously.

  • AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    4 months ago

    IMO the important thing isn’t just the use of objects, but the planning involved. Picking up a broomstick with your mouth doesn’t feel good, so there’s no reason the cow would do it for more than a moment unless she were already thinking ahead to its possible future use.

  • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    That’s cool. One day people will have sufficient empathy for consciousness that we’ll stop eating them.

    • undrwater@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      4 months ago

      There is a growing body of science that plants may have more consciousness than we originally thought (like this tool use by cows).

      Assuming this becomes established fact, it would be hard to find something to eat that wasn’t conscious.

      • usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.mlOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        Not the person you originally replied to, but eating plants directly would at least be a sort of harm reduction in that case. It takes a lot more plants to raise non-human animals than to just use plants directly. This is also a big part of why the environmental impact is so high for meat, dairy, etc.

        1 kg of meat requires 2.8 kg of human-edible feed for ruminants and 3.2 for monogastrics

        https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S2211912416300013

      • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        We really have to stretch the definition of consciousness to get there.

        But sure. Let’s get to that point and worry about it then. Rather than wait around for more research and kill things we know are conscious.

          • amzd@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            As long as you are not using it as a reason to continue your oppression, I don’t mind you doing any thought experiment