Pro@programming.dev to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 months agoWe Should Immediately Nationalize SpaceX and Starlinkjacobin.comexternal-linkmessage-square178linkfedilinkarrow-up1654arrow-down167
arrow-up1587arrow-down1external-linkWe Should Immediately Nationalize SpaceX and Starlinkjacobin.comPro@programming.dev to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 months agomessage-square178linkfedilink
minus-squaremojofrododojo@lemmy.worldcakelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10·2 months agoI’ve been saying this for years. the footprint that spaceX represents in national launch authority is out of whack to say the least.
minus-squarepostmateDumbass@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·2 months agoThe only reason SpaceX exists is because Boeing and Lockheed managed to compete so badly the only solution was to merge their launch businesses. So we had one launch company, then spaceX made it two providers, now its back to one because B-mart is using antiquated launch systems (single use).
minus-squaremojofrododojo@lemmy.worldcakelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down2·2 months agothis isn’t incorrect. ULA is a fucking pork barrel of hideous proportions. doesn’t mean we shouldn’t nationalize spacex.
minus-squaregian linkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 months ago The only reason SpaceX exists is because Boeing and Lockheed managed to compete so badly the only solution was to merge their launch businesses. To compete even worse
I’ve been saying this for years. the footprint that spaceX represents in national launch authority is out of whack to say the least.
The only reason SpaceX exists is because Boeing and Lockheed managed to compete so badly the only solution was to merge their launch businesses.
So we had one launch company, then spaceX made it two providers, now its back to one because B-mart is using antiquated launch systems (single use).
this isn’t incorrect. ULA is a fucking pork barrel of hideous proportions. doesn’t mean we shouldn’t nationalize spacex.
To compete even worse