• @NeoNachtwaechter@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    747 months ago

    A Tesla engineer said the test was done wrong because the frunk increases in pressure every time.

    “You are holding it wrong!” 🤣

      • @cley_faye@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        127 months ago

        I’m sure these “engineers” were confused everytime they saw an elevator door not mercilessly crush people.

        • gian
          link
          fedilink
          English
          07 months ago

          Nope, but they probably know that an elevator doors and a car lid are two completely different thing with different use cases and security concerns.

            • gian
              link
              fedilink
              English
              07 months ago

              Obviously.

              But let’s face it: if the car lid would never close if something is in the way, some other dumb youtuber would have made a video about it and here there would be a discussion about how stupid are the engineers to not let the lid close even if a bag in slightly on on the way and the user know what they are doing.

              • @cley_faye@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                17 months ago

                You’re missing the point of a safety feature. The car shouldn’t, by itself, close the lid if something’s in the way. It should allow the user to push it down, or disable it temporarily, to do so.

                The point of a safety feature in any system is to prevent unexpected situation from having unexpected consequences, not to be a magic solution that accommodate for brainless people. In one direction, you can make the judgement call and force the thing down, in the other direction you lose a finger.

                • gian
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  07 months ago

                  You’re missing the point of a safety feature. The car shouldn’t, by itself, close the lid if something’s in the way. It should allow the user to push it down, or disable it temporarily, to do so.

                  I get the safety feature. The point is that here I am saying to the car to close the lid even if something is in the way. I made a conscious decision to do so, and more than one time, so I expect the car to do it. But I agree that it could have been designed in a better way.

                  The point of a safety feature in any system is to prevent unexpected situation from having unexpected consequences, not to be a magic solution that accommodate for brainless people. In one direction, you can make the judgement call and force the thing down, in the other direction you lose a finger.

                  Which is exactly what happened here. He made the judgement call to ignore the safety feature (and probably ignored how the feature works)

        • @barsquid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          67 months ago

          This breakthrough technology could finally provide a way to teach people on the MTA not to hold the doors.

    • @ozymandias117@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      237 months ago

      If it increases in pressure every time, I’m now curious how many times you need to close the trunk to cut a finger off