This would’ve worked just a few years back but due to shitty “age verification” laws, even TV manufacturers willl force users to create an account the very least for the TV to even start up. They may also implement an always-online model and they’ll justify that it’s necessary to monitor users for “age verification purposes”. ATP better to get a good monitor and use it as TV cuz cable or satellite boxes are either way gonna be provided by the network companies so that’s there

Then why do they have the word “buy” on the PS store🤨

In fact, MegaLag in his video noted that one of initial lawsuits was disposed off hence part 3 took a long time to make without much of an update

Grabbing up a grok sub cuz only grok has the guts to tell the truth…even if it goes against it’s creators

Fair point. Even my asus zenbook 2025 around 20% of times when I close my lid, it goes to hibernation and asus Software notifies that due to system not going to sleep within time, it was forced to go into hibernate. In Linux, forcing might work for s3 but u need to test out wirh everything. Else it’ll be stuck in between. Do you have a system currently which is comparable to framework specs? Yes I know they have much better out of the box suppoet for Linux but in this way you can test out you main Hardware for support. Try a live boot on a system and then check.

Also, notice one thing…along with windows, MacOS also lost share during the same time. People are fed up with Apple too!

Update: GitHub has started sending notices to users who forked the bitchat repo, requesting them to take them down due to Indian government order

Happy to report that as of a few hours ago, the protest has achieved the targets

Update: serverHold status has been removed from t.me after Telegram removed the sanctioned company’s channel. t.me links are all working now.

Update: A few provisions of chat control 1.0 jas unfortunately passed today along with amendments to two provisions. Details: https://thecybersecguru.com/news/eu-chat-control-2026-guide/

New update

The expedited procedure has been approved, and a subsequent vote on Chat Control 1.0 is scheduled for this Thursday.

The vote tallies were as follows:

For: 331

Against: 304

Abstentions: 11

Wait…does this mean every time someone wearing a meta glass looked at me…rather its camera looked at me, meta stored my face for profiling purposes regardless of me being an user of meta Apps or not?? This is so messed up. Initially I thought that only friends of meta users used to get profiled via face recognition…wtf…but again it’s meta…violated multiple privacy laws and as such…so not a surprise tbh