open source is free, as in freedom. you want an open source license that:

1. forces you to share the code, even when it is not deployed (playing around at coding? share everything, to whom? don’t care, share you mfker!!!).
2. forces you to pay a tithe to the developer.

They are even allowed to modify it, even make derivative work, without open sourcing it, as long as they don’t distribute said derivative work.

i am not a lawyer, but isn’t that similar to gpl?

also, why should the company’s profit go to a developer they don’t employ?

I am not saying that software written in C is bad

after implying that code written in C is inherently insecure 🥴