• TheDarkKnight@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      40
      ·
      2 years ago

      They’re somehow WORSE than duckduckgo nowadays like how? You were the search leader, people used DDG for privacy reasons but they passed you??? Did you forget why you’re a company? It’s because you were the best fucking search engine ever and you decided to sell that title for ads or some shit. Incredible how Google fell off the fucking side of a mountain they themselves built!

      • ilinamorato@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        2 years ago

        For me it went from “great” to “usable” over the course of a decade or so, and then from “usable” to “worthless” over the course of six months. It’s a remarkably awful trajectory.

      • DreamButt@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 years ago

        Is ddg actually good now? I remember it feeling nearly useless waay back when it was first hitting the scene. Might have to give it a shot again

        • jagungal@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          2 years ago

          I’m not a power user, but I’ve used DDG exclusively for a while now and I often forget that I’m using it. I’d say it’s a pretty seamless transition nowadays.

        • qaz@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          It’s interesting, but $120 a year is just too much for me.

              • snowe@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 years ago

                When you use 1/10th the searches because you get it all in the very first query your usage goes wayyyy down. even then, you aren’t limited to 300 searches. you can go over, you just pay per search. and even with that if you can’t do that then just default to DDG then. I found DDG to be terrible, not at all better than Bing by itself, so Kagi was something I tried and immediately fell in love with. It just works. And I don’t have to worry about any of my data going anywhere at all, to any advertisers for anything, or for tracking, etc.

                • qaz@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  2 years ago

                  I’ve done 418 searches today and it’s still noon. That’s ~1254 a month. Even if my searches went down by 90% I’d still be 4.18 times over.

                  … Kagi was something I tried and immediately fell in love with. It just works.

                  Does it also work with very specific technical searches? Could it for example search for the behavior of atol when it encounters an alphabetical character? Neither Google, Bing nor DuckDuckGo provide me with an answer. Google doesn’t even show cppreference in the top 5.

  • WallEx@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    They should have invested in their potential, their search engines. It’s getting shittier almost daily.

    • Dkarma@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 years ago

      Makes you wonder if they just stopped paying they’d have 23 billion more and I wonder what they’d lose in market share. If it is less than 23 bil it makes sense to just not pay.

  • onlinepersona@programming.devBanned from community
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    2 years ago

    Hopefully the antitrust trial will end up telling Google they cannot pay anybody for preference of their browser. That would be the best outcome.

    The MO of current “market leaders” is not to compete but gatekeep.

  • ryan213@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 years ago

    Approximately 16% of their revenue or 29% of their profit. I’d take that tradeoff any day.