• essteeyou@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    3 years ago

    I’m glad for the EU, California, and other places that are big enough to force this sort of stuff nationally or globally.

    • Orbituary@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      3 years ago

      Every so often the phrase “where California goes the nation follows” comes true. I had a feeling about this one, but not so soon nor decisively.

  • kksgandhi@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    3 years ago

    Same thing happened with net neutrality, California put NN into law, and the rest of the country followed because it doesn’t make sense to build a separate Internet for California.

  • WallEx@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    3 years ago

    Didn’t they influence the creation of this law? I’m still sceptical of its effectiveness.

  • RememberTheApollo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    3 years ago

    4 choices: don’t sell in CA, fight the law, make a separate phone to meet R2R laws that are likely going to become more prevalent, release a press report portraying magnanimity towards R2R and make the bare minimum effort to meet the law.

    The last is the only real answer.