• BillBurBaggins@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    34
    ·
    6 days ago

    Pretty sure they thought of this. But maybe you are the first very smart person ever to think of it, who knows

    • Meron35@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      6 days ago

      They have and they’ve explicitly said it’s not solved lmao

      A 1% attack success rate—while a significant improvement—still represents meaningful risk. No browser agent is immune to prompt injection, and we share these findings to demonstrate progress, not to claim the problem is solved

      Mitigating the risk of prompt injections in browser use \ Anthropic - https://www.anthropic.com/research/prompt-injection-defenses

      • BillBurBaggins@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        16
        ·
        6 days ago

        I’ve used agents, they tell you everything they’re going to do. And they’re incredibly slow and stupid. I don’t think OPs original premise of it instantly and secretly stealing your bank account details is realistic.

        I don’t think I said prompt injection didn’t exist, just that it didn’t need to be worried about by users in exactly the way that was described