It’s wild just how much they’re trying to shove AI down our throats.

  • Gorilladrums@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    I need someone to explain to me, what situation could possibly arise that would require me to use Copilot on my fucking TV?

    • Rooty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      4 days ago

      The same reason why windows has that stupid desktop search - so that some twat with an MBA can brag about user engagement and justify his existence. Also, to hoover up user data for slop machine training.

    • drspectr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      Don’t think about what copilot can do for you that’s some socialism talk!, think about how it could squeeze profits and data from your instead ~Microsoft lunatics

      • panda_abyss@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        This is like how I save money on internet by having cable I don’t watch.

        The execs just want that cable subscriber number to go up so they effectively pay me to have it.

        They had the same thing with landlines for a while.

  • PissingIntoTheWind@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    ·
    4 days ago

    My company received an email from Microsoft this week.

    “From our data you are not selling Ai features as much as your competitors and we suggest that you start changing this or you will be left behind.”

    It was a completely bullshit email. But the stupids at my company are now worried that Microsoft is tracking the features we’re selling with our computers. Like if that wasn’t the most glaring red flag “we have spent way too much money on this and we need you to prove we aren’t dumbasses” I don’t know what is.

    I still will not sell Ai outside of its basic uses. And I’m backed up by the old heads in my department. Ai is not for everything.

    • dantheclamman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      4 days ago

      One day, literally every Gsuite product immediately and incessantly started nagging us to use Gemini. Fortunately our tech staff quickly switched it all off. We have slowly been re-enabling features that are useful like meeting transcriptions. I just wish these corporations could have more restraint. In previous waves of improvement in tech, usage dictated investment in new products. These days, they seem to feel the need to coerce us to use their products as they insist we should. I think users are getting fatigued by this dynamic. I used to be the first to install every update and try new apps and products. These days, I’m excited when I can stop using a product, and I don’t think it’s just due to age. It means I can stop having to be vigilant about some company I know is searching for ways to exploit me.

      • justaman123@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        Yeah the MBA guys who pushed enshitification were empowered because their strategies made more money so they must know what they are doing right? Now things don’t happen because they are better they happen because these guys think there is money. And the guys who used to pick the best ideas are out being rich somewhere

    • panda_abyss@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      Last year I quit a job that added AI use to performance reviews.

      It was basically “if we’re not all in on AI our competitors will be, we all need to learn it”.

      Nobody paid for their product for AI before, they paid for a product that was simple and reliable so that their business didn’t have to worry about issues and could dicks on their core competencies.

      I watched some sheisters build some impressive money furnaces, they got the praise while I got sidelined for pointing out the costs. I literally showed the forecasted costs of tens of thousands a week on basically a vanity feature with no payout, and the execs all said yeah that was fine, it’s AI. Then two months later they were asking me why our costs went up so much and why they didn’t know that would happen, and I just pointed to my date stamped presentation of the numbers and meeting notes they approved (and my numbers were 99% accurate to the true costs).

      When execs ignore my advice and warnings I leave.

        • panda_abyss@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 days ago

          That’s not my worst one. I did an analysis for one company which took 2 months since their data was such a mess. They were spending at least $10m/year (20 high comp devs) developing a product that was pulling in 8k/year. They did not have a path to growing revenue 1000x on that one, when I told the ceo and he doubled down that it was a bet they wanted to make. They really just wanted the nice slide deck for the board.

          I checked in a year later and they were still working on it. Two years later they mothballed it. They could have saved millions by listening to me.

    • skisnow@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 days ago

      “This technology is so useful we’re going to force it on you every way we can think of”

  • chunes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    4 days ago

    The controversy centers on a Reddit post in the r/mildlyinfuriating subreddit, where a user lamented the unexpected addition of Copilot following an automatic update. The post, which garnered thousands of upvotes and comments, describes the AI tool appearing as a non-deletable app on the TV’s interface.

    “Widespread backlash” 🙄

    • aesthelete@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      Honestly, though this is the definition of “widespread backlash” when it comes to red pilled garbage. So I’ll take it.

  • Yggstyle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    4 days ago

    This shit is why more people now have dabbled in DNS blocking and vlans. Its “your” equipment but you need to literally treat it as hostile.

    • panda_abyss@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      Anything you didn’t program yourself should be assumed hostile.

      Lots of open source gets a pad because grumpier people than me review it and they seem to have good taste, but I still don’t blindly trust it.

    • Treczoks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 days ago

      Well, at least LG has a range of TVs turned monitors, i.e. without all that “smart” shit. So they have a usable alternative, something other vendors don’t.

  • mycodesucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    This comes up a lot, and I don’t necessarily get it. I have all smart TVs, and I just never, ever, EVER let them connect to wifi even ONCE for any reason. It’s not like it NEEDS it for anything.

    • Jason2357@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      3 days ago

      It’s not like it NEEDS it for anything.

      I see this take online a lot, but in person, everywhere I go people play netflix and whatever directly on their TV. I think there might just be a huge divide in perspective between those with and without game consoles of some sort always connected to their TV.

    • wondrous_strange@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 days ago

      Totally, although the thing is I bet one day tvs will come with a built in sim card, or worst yet will disable themselves until there’s an active internet connection or some other scummy method

      • invictvs@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        I think they kind of do the active Internet part now. I don’t watch television and haven’t touched a TV for a long time, but recently I had to help a neighbour set his new smart TV up. It was one of the big brands, I don’t remember if it was LG, Samsung or something else. The TV couldn’t go through initial set up without me installing some app on his phone. If there was an option to skip I couldn’t see where it was, I only assume that if it was possible it was intentionally made un-intuitive or hard to discover. And of course, if you want the TV to connect to the app you must connect it to Internet. Again, it may have been a failure on my part, but I wouldn’t be supprised if they intentionally forced the user to do it this way.

        Samsung had something similar on their cheaper phones (the A series) where during the initial set up it asks you to login or create a Samsung account and you have to jump through a couple of hoops to skip it, as well as some other part where I don’t remember what the phone asked you to do, but the “Yes” option was blue, while the button to skip was intentionally colored the same or very similar shade of gray as an inactive button. So if the TV was Samsung I don’t doubt for a second that they will do some shady practice like that.

    • buddascrayon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      This right here is the answer. There are so many devices you can plug into those things that you don’t really need the crap that they installed natively.

      • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 days ago

        Not to mention they often cheap out on both the software and hardware, so you end up having to slowly navigate through poorly designed UIs that it struggles to display.

  • tomkatt@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    4 days ago

    So glad I blocked my LG C1 from the internet ages ago. Haven’t received updates in forever, don’t care. It’s a TV, it shows pictures. I even still have it LAN enabled so it can be controlled via Home Assistant automations, it just can never leave the home network, and that’s how I like it.

    I can’t even remember how long ago I set it up to do this, I think it was when I heard rumor they’d be including ads in the UI, maybe 2023 or so.

  • Netrunner@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    3 days ago

    I have my TV on WiFi network that has no Internet access so at least I can control it via homeassistant still. It doesn’t need Internet for anything but the UI so just get a shield and strip that down

  • DylanMc6 [any, any]@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    clankers should be segregated from society. oh and to the hexbear people: “clanker” is technically NOT a slur. seriously!

  • ClydapusGotwald@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    Easy way to never get this. Don’t connect the tv to internet. Literally get an Apple TV or fire stick or something else as a media player.

    • michaelalf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 days ago

      For the love of Mithras do not get a fucking firestick. The amount of data collection and phone home requests those things do is actually insane. Not to mention they’re locked down hard now, you can’t even change launchers. You’ll be back at square one with a TV spewing ads at you without consent, and you can’t do shit.

    • Jhex@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 days ago

      if you get one of those you end up in the same place with more steps… you need to hook up a pc (any format), preferably running Linux, so you have full control

      • Squizzy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 days ago

        Amd streamers dont give hd on desktop devices.

        So if we go this route we need to bring our sea legs.

        • mycodesucks@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          4 days ago

          So they don’t waste my bandwidth on badly compressed, huge source video that I can’t see the difference on anyway?

          Sounds like win/win to me.

    • Telodzrum@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      4 days ago

      The panels all come from two producers (really just one for the very good ones). So, pick whoever you can get the best deal on for your needed featureset and never connect it to the internet.

      • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        and never connect it to the internet.

        How many of them force you to connect to the internet as part of of the initial setup wizard “in order to register and enable your new tv”?

        AFAIK, some of the TVs with built in Roku have been forcing exactly that before they will allow you to do anything.

    • kameecoding@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 days ago

      LG, Samsung are still fine, you just don’t connect them to the internet and use an android tv instead

    • BCsven@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 days ago

      Its looking like our future will be buying dumb industrial display panels and running a RaspberryPi as your streaming service device

  • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    Irony is LG has their own open weights AI: Exaone 32B.

    https://huggingface.co/LGAI-EXAONE

    It’s… not terrible. Especially for a multilingual, locally runnable one. But they gave it a license from the depths of hell, that even forbids reverse engineering and basically claims all its outputs, so no one uses it.

    https://huggingface.co/LGAI-EXAONE/EXAONE-4.0.1-32B/blob/main/LICENSE

    Anyway, I find it darkly hilarious that they choose to snub their own research, and their Tenstorrent partnership, and shove copilot in instead. How much you wanna bet they namedrop OpenAI in their earnings report?

    This is corporate enshittification at its purest.

  • Fit_Series_573@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    4 days ago

    It seems TV aren’t even owner by the owners anymore. I don’t watch TV nor game anymore but seeing the amount of ads when just turning on tvs at friends houses is wild and now with this it’s doing way too much to just be a display. Whoever decides to start making dumb tvs again at mass with all the newer tech like hdr and dolby atmos in it will have a booming business but I guess no residuals after the sale no unlimited growth for investors.

    • Imhereforfun@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      4 days ago

      For now, at least in Europe, I have removed every single ad on TV just buy going to the terms and conditions and not giving them consent. But I am using Samsung smart TV and I’m in Europe.