You can’t get rid of it, you can only hide it: Microsoft imposes controversial Windows Backup on users::Like it or not, the Windows Backup app installed in Windows 10 and Windows 11 is here to stay, with Microsoft calling it a “system component” that can’t be

  • Nindelofocho@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    55
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    coming soon: Monthly subscription to use windows with the justification that it uses an online service in order to work

    • georgette@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 years ago

      I can’t wait for the eventual warning pop-ups and emails, warning me that my onedrive is almost full (70%)

      • sock@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 years ago

        what do you mean by this

        do u think a cloud pc (with constant server costs) shouldnt be a monthly fee?

        • Reygle@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 years ago

          I think this is likely the “new only Windows option” in the not so distant future. I think it shouldn’t exist.

    • BlueBockser@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      2 years ago

      Probably an unpopular opinion, but I don’t see a problem with subscriptions for commercial software. Fixing bugs and security issues after release is an ongoing effort that costs money, so a one-time purchase isn’t really economically viable in the long run. I honestly wouldn’t feel comfortable using unmaintained software that might contain known but unfixed vulnerabilities.

      • Nindelofocho@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        As someone who advises on and implements software at work that would be sorta ok if these companies charging several thousand a year would actually fix bugs and provide proper support. Zendesk is a pretty big display of this: feature requests lay dormant in their support pages, the only way you can get support is through a chat where the rep will point you to an article you already read most of the time, updates that ever obfuscates settings into a dizzying amount of menus in the admin panel, and so on. All for a minimum of $55 a month per seat if you want email and calling. The issue is costs are sky high for practically no value

    • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      2 years ago

      Imagine how much better the computing landscape would be today if we actually prevented MS from doing anticompetitive and often straight-up illegal stuff in the 90s to gain their monopoly

      • rwhitisissle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        That would require government oversight and accountability. Best I can do is regulatory capture and the continued gutting of American anti-trust law.

      • voodooattack@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        Linux has so many options it’s ridiculous. It doesn’t force you to use them or to upload sensitive data to Microsoft’s servers—and therefore the NSA’s—though.

    • 1995ToyotaCorolla@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 years ago

      I’ve grown up with windows (started with windows 95 in elementary school) and have been a Linux user since 2009. Watching windows decline and the Linux desktop grow and mature has been quite the ride. I’ve been distro-hopping for years and have finally settled on Debian Testing. It does exactly what I tell it to do. It helps me accomplish whatever task I’m doing and then gets out of the way.

      Windows on the other hand is the polar opposite of that. Constantly nagging you to use OneDrive. New panels and “experiences” popping up out of nowhere. Unskippable OOBEs after a major update that force you to navigate some dark pattern if you have the audacity to resist using a Microsoft account. The telemetry that you know is running under the hood 24/7. Hands and knees begging you to use Edge to open PDFs?!?! Using windows today is like using Clippy - the operating system.

      Linux has come such a long way, and outside of some proprietary edge cases, I can no longer imagine using Windows as a daily driver

      • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        Yep.

        Windows 10 was the window into what was to come and how microsoft wanted to ruin windows in the future, Which was further ruined “refined” in 11.

        I’m on linux to stay now, now that I’ve ironed out most of my problems, the only issues I have anymore are manufactured and artificial issues, like Amazon refusing to stream in anything higher than 360p because my system isnt “secure”, or like AMDs stupid convoluted AMDRewards system not working.

  • Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 years ago

    As a non windows user, can someone explain to be what all the fuss is about? It sounds like people are grumpy that they’re being shown a feature that they can’t use or don’t want to use, and MS is going to let people hide the UI for that.

    What is wrong with this solution? Are people not going to be happy until every spec of the feature’s code is stripped from the OS?

    • my_hat_stinks@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      2 years ago

      It sounds like people are grumpy that they’re being shown a feature that they can’t use or don’t want to use,

      That’s the problem right there. They’re trying to sell you a new feature. That’s an ad. Ads have no place in an operating system.

      • chinpokomon@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 years ago

        When does something become an OS feature and when is it an add-on? Consider the use case. If you need to make a backup or restore data from one, by having this as part of the OS it is always available. It’s line having vi installed; it comes with every Linux distro, but a lot of folks use Emacs. It makes sense that this should be a system component.

  • Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    I consider everyone still using Windows by now to be masochists of the worst kind.

    Who would want to have backups of important files on a Microsoft server? Probably located in the USA, where it’s contents are free game for the snooping agencies? If you are not a US citizen (and even that is no real protection) they will hoover every byte about you “just in case”.

    • pathief@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 years ago

      Not masochists, just people with very different needs, privacy concerns and overall tech knowledge than you. Not sure why this is hard to understand by some folks.

      • Treczoks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        Yep. The general “I don’t care what I’m doing” crowd. Serves them well that they simply ignore the facts steamrolling them.

        • pathief@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          I think you’re the one ignoring the fact that Windows is the right OS for some people. Everyone has different needs and limitations. There’s not one OS that is the right solution for everyone, just like there’s no Linux distribution that is right for everyone.

          • Treczoks@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            While it might be the right OS for some people, it is actually the worst choice for the majority. And I would say that for those people for whom it is the best choice, it just is for the wrong reasons.

            • pathief@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              2 years ago

              From my personal perspective, the right way to steer people into Linux is to highlight the key features you feel are the best. You don’t need to say Windows is bad, only that Linux is amazing. If you just tell people they’re masochists and wrong they’ll just ignore you. Have a nice day!

    • Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      2 years ago

      I’m waiting for the inevitable Lemmy comment from an engineer or sys admin that tells me to install Linux.

      • 0ddysseus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        2 years ago

        Well I’m neither of those. I’m not a tech bro and I don’t really understand computers well or what a tick tock does. I’m just an old dude who’s been using standard desktop stuff since windows 3.1 and DOS before that.

        You should install Linux unless you absolutely need either commercial architecture software or Excel for specific things.

        MS is the devil and windows sucks balls. I use windows on a work machine and it is objectively worse than most Linux flavours.

        Start on Mint or KDE Neon if you’re coming from windows.

        As they say, don’t knock it till you try it.

  • Draconic NEO@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 years ago

    You can’t get rid of it, you can only hide it

    Not exactly true, there are ways you can remove system components, what they really mean is that Microsoft Doesn’t want you to and will fight you as much as possible to prevent you from doing so. The biggest barrier in doing it is that you’ll have to figure out your way through it on your own because it’s “not supported” and most people won’t give help or support for these kinds of modifications.

  • remotelove@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Use local accounts only and do not login to a Microsoft account.

    Edit: In my situation, I used an MS account during a reinstall and disabled backups and logged out quickly after. There are methods to still do an offline install, from what I understand.

    Disabling backup is annoying, but not hard.