Apple will no longer fix the $17,000 gold Apple Watch::The original Apple Watch models, including the $10,000-plus 18-karat gold Edition that Beyoncé wore, are now officially obsolete and won’t get parts, repair, or replacement services.

  • VelociCatTurd@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    85
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Even before they were unsupported, how have they not been “obsolete” for some time. Cannot imagine how slow a gen 1 watch would be. I can see the appeal of a timeless heirloom watch, but this is such a brain dead purchase.

    • M500@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      80
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Well, it’s not a brain dead purchase when $20k doesn’t even register for you.

      Got $500,000,000 in the bank? Who cares?

      You family has billions and you just have an unlimited alllowance. Who cares.

      That’s who this is for.

      With that being said, Apple did it for one year and I think it was just a marketing stunt. Everyone talked about it and now people know what an Apple Watch is.

      • VelociCatTurd@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        2 years ago

        It is for those with more money than sense, 100%. No matter how much money you have, it’s not going to solve the problem of it being incompatible with a newer iPhone. And that makes anyone who bought this a clown.

        • erwan@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 years ago

          The point is that for them, it doesn’t matter if the watch is obsolete and ends up in a drawer after a few years. They’ll just buy a new one.

          For them 20k is like $20 for you.

      • Hackerman_uwu@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        That’s accurate I think but the departure point here is where Apple was making noises about delivering ‘premium jewellery’ or some such spiel.

        Rolex, Omega, etc. all support their products for life and beyond. I’m still able to get my dads Speedmaster from the 60s serviced, heck my daily driver Seiko Pepsi from the 80s still has parts available.

        Apple can easily afford this level of support which makes it kind of iffy that they don’t.

  • weeeeum@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    70
    ·
    2 years ago

    The irony of building something so expensive, opulent and heirloom worthy around one of the most rapidly depreciating assets you can buy (technology)

    • XTornado@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      I mean is at the end is a watch… at worst case the basic function will work. Although I admit that the battery is still a problem in this case. And that’s even if you look at the hour and isn’t just an accessory that you barely use it’s function.

      • FleetingTit@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 years ago

        Once the batteries of those things die (and they will die in short order) they are completely useless. Just small black bricks with a hint of gold on the outside.

  • paddirn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    2 years ago

    For +$17,000, that shit better have a lifetime guarantee on it, though I guess anyone with $17,000 to throw away on a watch probably doesn’t care anyways, they’ve probably forgotten that they own the thing anyways.

    • madcaesar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 years ago

      Anyone who has 19,000$ to blow on a watch needs to be taxed a additional 18,000$

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 years ago

    Honestly, good. Fuck the people who have this sort of money to throw away. They deserve it.

  • conc@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    I thought her fingers were her lips & chin

  • illah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    I still use the original sport band from 2015 on a 7th gen watch, and it fit the 4/5 gen before that. Unless the gold band was non removable from the watch I don’t see the issue.

    Also the fact that this was never publicly available means these were gifts to celebs for PR, ain’t nobody losing any money on this.

  • (╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    You know what? Good.

    If you want to buy something fancy you could buy an expensive “dumb” one that won’t lose its value in a year or so. It’s the buyers fault.

    Unless you want it for working out I find smartwatches stupid. Are you so busy that you can’t pull your phone out of your pocket?

    Edit: I take it back, yeah seems that there are some specific reasons like those below for wearing a smartwatch.

    I still find spending 17k in a luxury watch dumb, a Rolex (I have no idea how much they are worth) still seems better because it won’t lose it’s value like when the smartwatch OS becomes obsolete.

    • kamasutures@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 years ago

      Mine are pretty specific but:

      1. I’m a bartender. I can get messages if the door person/security is having a problem customer while I am elbow deep in an ice well (plus phones are dirty so I’m not touching gross phone and then your lime wedge even if I am super religious about washing my hands with everything I touch behind bar.) I don’t wear it all the time but it is a useful tool.

      2. I monitor my heart rate cos I’m having health issues

      Butttt… I don’t feel bad for these folks, mine came with my phone.

  • Zummy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 years ago

    So Apple will no longer fix the watch that came out 8 years ago? I mean, how long should they have fix products for? You buy a $17,000 dollar watch don’t be surprised if the company that no longer sells the watch and hasn’t sold it in 8 years, won’t fix it. There are legitimate things to criticize Apple for. This isn’t one of them.

  • Zummy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    I mean, Apple is currently supporting a 5 year old phone and it will probably be supported more years. Additionally, with last years iOS, they supported a 6 year old phone. So I don’t think support is an issue. In general, Apple supported the watch for several years. And the only thing they won’t don’t do is be able to repair it. However, since you want to talk about Google repair, let’s talk about how the Google Watch cannot be respired…by anyone. Literally if it breaks you throw it in the trash. So, maybe Google isn’t the best comparison.