All these (ad)ons always take priority over performance.

  • relyn@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    122
    ·
    2 years ago

    Am I the only one who doesn’t want any, “do everything,” apps? I’d rather have 10 apps that each do one thing really well than have one app that haphazardly attempts to do 10 things.

    • afunkysongaday@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      2 years ago

      Make each program do one thing well. To do a new job, build afresh rather than complicate old programs by adding new “features”.

      Unix philosophy. 50 years old idea. Imo devs would love to work that way but they are never the ones making decisions. And every CEO wants to have the new everything app ala wechat.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      If I want to shop for something online, I’ll go to a website like Amazon.

      If I want to transfer money online, I’ll go to a website like PayPal.

      I don’t like the monopolizing those companies are doing, but they’re at least more transparent than doing it through a chat app. Can you even do returns for chat app purchases? I did a return with Amazon the other day and they just credited my account. They didn’t even ask for the book (I accidentally bought 2 copies) back.

  • Neptune@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    WhatsApp is a shithole. Communities, Channels, Payments, Avatars all these destroyed the simple chat app. Meta is aiming for a monopoly here.

    Signal and Telegram pretty much useless if you don’t have your needful people on the platform.

  • Synapse@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    2 years ago

    Great, I can’t wait for Whatsapp to be the only way to reach customer support and make payments. I always felt the confused look of people when I tell them I don’t have Whatsapp wasn’t enough.

  • skymtf@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    I feel like FOSS apps keep getting more viable while closed source apps keep getting worse. I feel like the next version of the internet is the one few know about. Even Mastodon is getting better, and Lemmy is pretty much a reddit equivalent now.

  • DocMcStuffin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    At the company’s global Conversations event in Mumbai, WhatsApp introduced an in-app shopping feature for merchants and customers. Dubbed ”Flows,” […]

    That name sounds more like a feminine hygiene product than a shopping platform.

  • mightyfoolish@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    This is kind of funny. Some of these features I would see see as Google’s turf. However, since Google can’t create a text messaging service, Meta can use their messaging app to encroach.

  • progettarsi@feddit.it
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    pls whatsapp stop copying from fucking telegram there should be a law to make it not possible this is killing competition

  • avater@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    it really depends.

    If it’s different parts of the same system I really don’t like if it gets split up to multiple apps. Take steam, there I need two apps, one for the general store and it’s functions and one for communicating with my friends. In that case I’d rather would have one app that fits all.

    But if I don’t need several functions of an app and they are also hurting the experience with it, I’d rather would have the sourced out to other apps.