• just_another_person@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    7 days ago

    No, it actually hasn’t. It’s also not any better than any other battery tech out there right now. Longer term but less volume storage is a trade off.

    What happened to these Graphene batteries and capacitors we were supposed to have by now?

    • IronBird@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      sodium-ion is better than acid-lead in every use case (theoretically, when the tech reaches maturity), unlikely to beat lithium ion and others for the high-capacity/low weight type stuff but far as cheap/environmentally safe batteries goes sodium-ion should quickly dominate the field.

      • Valmond@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        7 days ago

        Yeah, this kind of tech can actually be groundbreaking.

        10.000 charge cycles? You can imagine lot’s of new things with that. Maybe not a capitalistic quick buck but something bettering society.

        Also for what I have understood it’s wildly better than lipo etc when it comes to resource use, especially “rare” earth.

        • ikidd@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          10k charge cycles isn’t revolutionary. LFP do 8k and even then they just drop down to 80% of original capacity.

          • Valmond@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 days ago

            For that price and energy density it IMO is

            You could load up your car at work (just a silly example) and use it up at night at home, without thinking of degrading your expensive batteries.

    • tty5@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      More durable, cheaper, can be operated at a wider temperature range and much safer, but at a cost of lower energy density.

      They look like a big step forward for uses where density matters little, like grid energy storage or small scale home backups.