xkcd #3126: Disclaimer

Title text:

You say no human would reply to a forum thread about Tom Bombadil by writing and editing hundreds of words of text, complete with formatting, fancy punctuation, and two separate uses of the word ‘delve’. Unfortunately for both of us, you are wrong.

Transcript:

Transcript will show once it’s been added to explainxkcd.com

Source: https://xkcd.com/3126/

explainxkcd for #3126

  • BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    1 year ago

    Not ChatGPT output — I’m just like this.

    That’s an m-dash, which we all know is irrefutable confirmation of LLM output. /s

    • CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      iirc its m-dash as well as constant rule of threes and generally using incredibly formal sentence structures even when the language involved is not formal in any way. Kind of like what I just did there though probably with an extra comma after m-dash.

  • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    You just have say fuck a lot…

    But I’m pretty sure any explanation of Bombadil less than 300 words would fail the Turing test

    • LOGIC💣@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      You can actually get LLMs to swear, sort of. They just won’t use real swear words. If you set up your LLM parameters to use a specific word for an expletive, but it’s not actually an expletive, then you can replace that word with your choice of expletive after the text is generated.

    • Stovetop@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      There’s always one good litmus test, if you can ask someone live before they have a chance to do a Google search: ask what the alt code is for an em dash.

      If they don’t immediately answer 0151, they’re full of shit.

        • Stovetop@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          Throw them into a lake, I guess. If they sink and drown, they’re innocent. If they float, you know they’re full of (buoyant) shit (and can then safely burn them at the stake if you want to).

        • Stovetop@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          That’s fine, LLMs use mainly em dashes so there would be no confusion, hence that being the litmus test.

        • Stovetop@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Hmmm, I think to know for sure, we’ll have to throw your device into a lake. Apples float, so if it’s a genuine Designed By Apple in California™ computer that supports that option, it won’t sink and then we’ll know you’re telling the truth.

  • Jankatarch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    you can keep using pronounciation correctly and writing long paragraphs of words if you lowercase it all, just saying.

    • dufkm@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      ChatGPT is changing the way we talk

      Started the video, and the first comment I saw was along the lines of “so it’s changing scripts that are read, not how people talk”. Had no need to watch any further.