• Dogiedog64@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        43
        ·
        29 days ago

        I mean, sure, that’s their plan, but you can only do that so many times before you run out of money, materials, water, or places to build. If ever there was proof that there’s no forward thinking in this tech bubble, this would be it.

        • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          edit-2
          29 days ago

          True but this isn’t specific to the tech bubble. It’s a feature of capitalism. Competition forces firms to adopt shorter term horizons. If a firm has significant profit to make by focusing on the short term and it does not, its competitor would. If the profit possoble within this period is significant, having the competitor collect it runs the risk of the current firm failing, or the competitor accumulating enough for hostile takeover, among other failures. That would stop the current firm onwer from collecting profits in the future. Even if focusing on the long term is more profitable over time, firms may not survive in a competitive environment to realize long term profits. These are some of the fundamental processes that drive firms into short term horizons. With liquid asset markets there are even more immediate processes driving firms into short term planning.

          Add to that planning based mainly on prices, which don’t capture a ton of reality and you get situations like a water hungry datacenter in the desert, cause the price of water does not capture its long term availability for example.

          All of this has happened in the past, even a century ago. It’s happened and keeps happening in other industries too. For example the fossil fuel industry.

          • JcbAzPx@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            28 days ago

            That’s more an artifact of modern corporate structure where a publicity traded entity must always be growing or it will be considered a failure.

    • d00phy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      29 days ago

      Yeah, seems like a desert isn’t the best place to build something where cooling is a critical factor! Or building something that uses massive amounts of chemical treated water for cooling in a place that has had water scarcity concerns for generations, now.

    • shalafi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      29 days ago

      Said in another comment, our deserts are tectonically stable and free of natural disasters. If you want redundant DCs, picking one on the desert is a good bet.

      • ✺roguetrick✺@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        29 days ago

        Yeah, all we got is man made tragedy of the commons disasters where the data centers deplete not only the water for humans, but the water for the data centers. Poof, no more data.

        • shalafi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          29 days ago

          I’m more worried about humans draining our aquifers that took thousands, even millions, of years to fill. That water is no more replaceable than oil.