The Trump administration recently published “America’s AI Action Plan”. One of the first policy actions from the document is to eliminate references to misinformation, diversity, equity, inclusion, and climate change from the NIST’s AI Risk Framework.

Lacking any sense of irony, the very next point states LLM developers should ensure their systems are “objective and free from top-down ideological bias”.

Par for the course for Trump and his cronies, but the world should know what kind of AI the US wants to build.

  • just_another_person@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    69
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 month ago

    Again, AMERICA doesn’t want this. This is some dumb shit from a mentally deficient and decrepit old man that somehow got elected under very shady terms by a minority of the country.

    • thedruid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      Thank you anyone who profiles entire people with stereotypes and outright lies is a bigot, no matter what they say

      • themurphy@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        Like how some americans see the Middel East, Russia, China, Israel, Palestine, Mexico etc etc etc…

        Its not nice when its going the other way, is it.

        • thedruid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          I don’t do that because it wouldn’t be right. Doesn’t matter who did what to me in the past.

          For instance if you were a plumber and you intentionally smashed a piece of furniture while at a clients house, does that mean all plumbers are violently vandalizing people’s homes ,no.

          Because adult human beings know that the actions of one do not define the actions of all.

          I am not changing this position. You can get the last word, throw an insult at me or do nothing.

          Choice is yours but I’m done. I don’t have to defend the correct position. It is correct.

          • themurphy@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            You are right. I don’t disagree at all. But racist mentallity is insane, and that is what I’m calling out. As do you.

      • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        LOL

        Sure, Jan.

        We should stop it. Period. I’ll snap my non-billionaire fingers and just stop it. Like I’m Dorothy and clicking my ruby slippered heels together.

        Most Americans are working three jobs and 100 hours a week to be able to rent a roach-infested studio and keep their kids from starving.

        AI isn’t even in the top ten of issues that most Americans have the time or energy to confront in a meaningful way.

        But let’s not allow the reality of life in this country to interfere with a good, silly Internet screed.

        • WizardofFrobozz@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          You just described a country full of miserable people with nothing to lose who are STILL doing fuck all.

          Was it your intent to bring their cowardice into starker relief, or to pretend that somehow they’re excused from acting like humans with agency because… “it’s hard?”

    • brianpeiris@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      17
      ·
      1 month ago

      What matters more? What AMERICA wants, or what the administration enacts in to policy? You’re missing the point if you’re arguing about my phrasing.

      • just_another_person@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        The phrasing means everything.

        Example: “Trump wants…”

        VS

        Example: “America wants…”

        Big difference. Executive Orders are a memo, not law. It’s disturbing that I have to keep saying this and explaining this.

          • just_another_person@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            1 month ago

            I’m arguing that you’re intentionally trying to play semantics with phrasing and claim it doesn’t matter, when it absolutely does, and everyone in here is explaining to you why. That’s all.

            • brianpeiris@lemmy.caOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              9
              ·
              1 month ago

              Okay. My argument is that the semantics don’t matter because what matters is policy.

              • just_another_person@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 month ago

                And since you did use the word “policy”, I did mention that EO’s aren’t laws. It’s a memo. He has no control via EOnof anyone except the people in his purview. Not private companies, not researches, not law, not state governments.

                  • just_another_person@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    1 month ago

                    EO’s are policy insofar as they can affect the Executive Branch and what it controls, and nothing else. The history of the use is mainly for “the spirit” of something, but only in the past 20 years or so has been weaponized to be used for trying to attempt to guide actual policy. Never in the way Trump has tried to use them, which is “law by decree”.

                    The joke is they know it’s bullshit and meaningless. This all happened in his first term. 220 total, 157 shot down in court, 27 revoked. It’s an office memo at best. Biden even tried to do thenstudent debt cancellation through EO, and it got shot down in court.