I would say that porn is less damaging than social media at this point.
I’m having a harder and harder time telling them apart.
I’m having a harder and harder time
What social media are you on?
The fuck is Linktree?
I pretty much never use instagram, but I follow a shitposting channel there, and every now and then I go into instagram to show someone some old shitpost.
I’ve concluded that the instagram algorithm is frustrated as fuck from not understanding anything about me, because I never click or hover on anything it shoves in my face. However, it’s concluded that I’m a horny dude.
The result is that it floods my feed with a bunch of soft-porn. I have no idea where this all comes from, or who is spending their time uploading a bunch of soft-porn to instagram, but there’s an absolute shitload of it.
Maybe via Meta’s tracking cookies that watch all over the internet!
While I’m aware that pretty much everything I do online is tracked, the stuff that’s shoved at me the rare times I open instagram or facebook indicate that they are clueless about how to get me to stick around. They throw a bunch of shit at the wall (mostly soft-porn or comic strips), but never anything that makes me look twice.
Even if they used it for porn right after they got it, who cares? Does it provide other benefits? Then it DOESN’T MATTER.
Silly gooners
Wasn’t there a standard before that got superseded or derogated by some other new law basically allowing this… you can lie with no consequences in your articles and news? and I’m talking about the US back in the 90’s I believe
Not to mention that plan and engagement of the NYT story is purely based on writers and potential readers relating to such fact, behave as if it is something worth of mentioning in a story in the first place borders hypocrisy… they forgot their first time got access to unlimited internet
I wonder if Musk will be saying anything about it.
deleted by creator
