• Cocodapuf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Lol, this is the truth. There are many cool opportunities for industry in space, but I gotta be honest, I don’t think datacenters are one of them…

    • TFO Winder@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      In deep craters near the Moon’s poles, permanent shadows keep the surface even colder — NASA’s Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter has measured temperatures lower than -410°F (-246°C)

      • dual_sport_dork 🐧🗡️@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s not the issue, though. In a vacuum there is no medium with which to carry the heat away. You can’t send it into the air with fans or heat sinks because there isn’t any air.

        At least on the moon you could sink it into the ground. But in orbit you don’t have that luxury. This is a major problem that spacecraft and satellite designs need to work around, and much effort is expended in that department.

        Even though space is generally considered “cold,” in the absence of a medium to sink heat into the best you can do is rely on infrared radiation which is not terribly effective.

  • huquad@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Having worked on these systems, datacenters in space still don’t make any economical sense to me. Cost of shipping, additional power and thermal limitations/challenges, much greater radiation environment causing corruption and premature hardware failures, and little to no maintenance/upgrade opportunities. Zero sense

  • db2@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Well I guess that’s what it takes to make Microsoft’s ocean bottom data center look reasonable. 😬