Also, interesting comment I found on HackerNews (HN):

This post was definitely demoted by HN. It stayed in the first position for less than 5 minutes and, as it quickly gathered upvotes, it jumped straight into 24th and quickly fell off the first page as it got 200 or so more points in less than an hour.

I’m 80% confident HN tried to hide this link. It’s the fastest downhill I’ve noticed on here, and I’ve been lurking and commenting for longer than 10 years.

  • Tramort@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    110
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    1 year ago

    Jesus. Something shady is happening with cloudflare.

    That does not inspire confidence.

    • slaacaa@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      74
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      The biggest red flag is the up-front payment for a year, gives the indication that they are in actual financial trouble, meaning short in cash right now.

      Fucking idiots could have been just increasing the price yearly without any resistance, it’s unlikely a big casino would care about an extra 50-100 per month.

      • foggy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I’m pretty heavily invested in cloudflare. This news is definitely making me reconsider that investment.

        What I can say, is their stock is looking very healthy. There are a lot of people buying a lot of stock for them and the prospect over the next 3 to 5 months looks very promising. The only way they wouldn’t have cash on hand as if they’re spending a ridiculous amount of cash on some project that I’m not aware of, and I feel like I would be aware of it.

        This is very peculiar. Definitely warrants further investigation.

        • raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          The only way they wouldn’t have cash on hand as if they’re spending a ridiculous amount of cash on some project that I’m not aware of, and I feel like I would be aware of it.

          Maybe someone dipshit in marketing heavily invested in LLMs, since that’s the current hype among dipshits?

          • kbotc@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Cloudflare is publicly traded. They had $1.6 billion in cash or equivalents in December. Maybe they want to grease up the quarter to show better growth against the market, but that is a fuckload of cash.

            • raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              or maybe it’s just a lower level manager who wants to polish up their revenue numbers to ask for a raise / promotion :) capitalists are ugly little critters like that.

      • Goodie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I think it’s far more likely there’s some sales goal and or performance indicator at play here.

    • HowManyNimons@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      30
      ·
      1 year ago

      CloudFlare don’t need to subsidise an online casino with millions of subscribers, at everyone else’s expense. Sure CF are a bunch of gigglefucks but this time I think they made a good decision.

      • Tramort@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        I read the post and it doesn’t sound abusive at all

        Plus: cloudflare kept putting them in touch with the sales department. Not legal. Not technical support

        It’s just shit customer service, even if the customer is making a ton of money compared to your fees. Should a casino pay more for other services, too, just because they" don’t need a subsidy"?

        • foggy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          As strange as this may sound… if you’re having serious technical problems, it’s the sales team you want to talk to.

          Sales people have way more pull at tech companies than the engineering teams do. If your sales rep sounds an alarm, people listen. When tech support sounds an alarm, nobody bats an eye.

          In this particular situation, they should be reaching out to cloudflare’s legal team. But, with their own legal team.

          • ✺roguetrick✺@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Good luck with the lawsuit for breach of contract when you broke the contract. I’m sure the judge will be amused.

      • TheEntity@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Subsidise how? They were using their existing plan as intended and even willing ditch the grey-area parts. If CF cannot afford to offer their plans as they are, they should change the offered plans, not hunt for easy prey.

        • HowManyNimons@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          15
          ·
          1 year ago

          Clearly CF were losing money on this account, so their other customers were subsidising.

          Ah fuck it, I’m clearly at the bottom of a dog pile here, and I don’t want to be friends with any of you, nor am I going to start thinking that an online casino deserves anything but contempt, so I’ll be off.

          • FederatedSaint@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            No no, you’re really not far off. Few, if any people here are advocating for CF to continue to provide the same services for the same price. It seems clear to most (including the author) that a price increase was justified. The problem we’re all having is how they went about it, agnostic of the client.

            (I don’t care who the client was and don’t care one way or the other about online casinos.)

      • raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s not the decision to ask more money, it’s how they made it and in violation of their own terms of service, also extortion, so yes they are dipshits.