• SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    2 years ago

    Upgrading because EV need the power is looked at suspiciously. If an entrepreneur says he needs power for his factory and they’ll ask by what date he needs the lines.

  • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    And according to this article the upgrades will happen and consumer’s electric bills will barely change:

    At the same time, the costs will be spread out over decades and only total up to (at most) three times the grid’s annual operation and maintenance costs. So in any one year, the costs shouldn’t be crippling. All that might be expected to drive the cost of electricity up. But Li and Jenn suggest that the greater volume of electricity consumption will exert a downward pressure on prices (people will pay more overall but pay somewhat less per unit of electricity).

    • Entropywins@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      The entirety of human civilization and a severe destabilization to all life on the planet.

    • ATDA@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Hell no.

      My state reps office told me we shouldn’t join the national grid because… " If another area has an emergency we’d have to share our power."

      He basically wigged out when I said that’s fine, THAT’S THE POINT.

      Edit for context this is in TX we basically have our own shitty grid for anyone not aware people froze to death in modern society when our grid failed…

  • Fedizen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    this seems low, especially because in like 10 years it will cost like 100 billion

  • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    From the article…

    The one wild card is direct current fast charging. Eliminating fast chargers entirely would reduce the number of feeders that need upgrades by 12 percent. Converting all public stations to DC fast charging, in contrast, would boost that number by 15 percent. So the details of the upgrades that will be needed will be very sensitive to the impatience of EV drivers.

    Anti Commercial-AI license (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)

  • billwashere@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    It would be better with distributed generation like solar. The idea of a central generation point and transmitting it long distances is just not the best way (single point of failure/attack, losses of long distance transmission, often dirty and/or dangerous). Having lots of little solar farms all over (or even private) is better. I’d imagine most of Californians could provide their own EV needs if you have a large enough roof.

    Take this with a grain of salt …. I’m not a power engineer but I did stay at a Holiday Inn Express last night.