• solrize@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    1 month ago

    You mean they want to identify you from your credit card instead of your phone number? Bah.

  • straussbelial@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    1 month ago

    Could you all just stop trying to flee corporate greed jumping from one company to another? We already have XMPP, Matrix and other descentralized solutions.

  • NarrativeBear@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    Oddly enough, once you make that three fiddy payment signal will now potentially have a payment method linked to your account.

    If this is true that payment method can essentially be tied to a identity.

    I suppose the reason they are choosing to do this is to prevent a influx of bot accounts and spammers/scammers.

    • lama@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 month ago

      And if you are worried about Google’s involvement in this, Greyson Parrelli of the Signal team points out that the payment runs through the same zero-knowledge proof setup it uses for donations.

      Looks like there is some way of decoupling the payer identity from the signal user

  • lostoncalantha@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    Yeah why am I donating $10 a month every month for them to come up with shit like this. Google? Really? Now I question what else is going on behind the scenes.