• CAVOK@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    30 days ago

    My question is “how many different tanks do we need”? Shouldn’t the EU have just one, or possibly two MBTs? Why duplicate all the efforts and maintain different setups?

    The US has one MBT.

    • Don_alForno@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      30 days ago

      The US is one country. I guess Italy would rather pump that money into their own industry. Just like most other members.

      • CAVOK@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        30 days ago

        That’s my point. We should work as one entity, not necessarily one country, but at least stop wasting resources with everyone doing their own thing. We have SEVENTEEN different types of tanks in Europe.

        When it comes to these things we should think of ourselves as EU first, country second, or we won’t make it in the might-makes-right future that the US is trying to shape.

    • Tattorack@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      30 days ago

      The US is one country with a single military doctrine.

      Europe is multiple countries who provide a military doctrine that best suits them.

  • jdr@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    30 days ago

    I agree that any future conflict will be pretty much WWII