• raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 day ago

    It’s not an agent, it’s whoever used whatever piece of software in whatever which way to connect to those systems, that’s who is responsible and both them and the people who set up an insecure Medicare network should be in jail. For a long time.

    • UsernamesAreForSuckers@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      This is a big problem with AI, laws have not remotely caught up to these scenarios. Then you have Argentina creating legal structures for AI corporations that could essentially do this type of stuff, but evade prosecution because the corporation will give the owner limited liability and with no employees, the only punishment can be to shut down the corporation. Then they can spin up a new AI corporation and do it all over again in theory. Technology is advancing far beyond our ability to control it properly and tech bros don’t care much about consequences since they have historically been so minimal. Move fast, break shit is a psychopathic ethos.

      • Electricblush@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Its easy. There are laws against hacking. If you used a script its still you who go in jail. If you used an Ai its still you who go to jail.

        Do not let them try to spin this into the autonomy narrative.

        Someone set up the agent, somebody gave it the prompt that caused this to happen. Some one did not do their job properly.

        Ai agents are not independent actors, they are tools.

        If I missmanage a forklift, I am held responsible. Breaks failed? I failed to do the right maintenance. Load fell down? I did not secure it right.

        This is not some impossible gordian knot to solve…

        • UsernamesAreForSuckers@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          18 hours ago

          I’m not saying I agree with the narrative. I’m saying it will be attempted and will be a problem before the legal system can catch up and address it. We will also be talking international law, which is trickier, as countries jockey to make friendly laws to get AI cash like Argentina. Especially with the tech industry constantly suing and lobbying.

  • HaraldvonBlauzahn@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    There is a company called CompuGroup Medical which is all-in on “AI” (LLM) and with a CEO funding far-right propaganda portals (Nius).