• culprit@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    142
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Jury Nullification is like the secret code of the US justice system.That’s why most of the people that work for the system absolutely despised the whole idea.

    • TeaWithDani@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      In a sense, its the system functioning as it should. If you have a healthy democratic society with good principals, juries should acquit people for things that may be crimes but are perfectly reasonable and justified.

    • Jason2357@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      Why should law enfocement and prosecuters get to decide which laws to enforce and which not to, but jurrors cant?

      Unless the laws on the books were short and perfect, there is always going to be enforcement choices, and it seems to me the jury nulification option is no worse than other selective enforcement. It lets guilty people go free, sure, but it sometimes stops unjust incarceration.

      • culprit@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        It’s a great mechanism for “peer review” especially in the sense that ethics and legality are often entirely different things.

      • culprit@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        Basically a jury can legally decide to nullify by declaring “not guilty” regardless of the facts or the judge’s instructions, etc. This is why even mentioning jury nullification during a trial can really upset the judge and the prosecution. It is supposed to be something every jury is aware of, but that is usually not actually the case.

        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jury_nullification