An artificial intelligence model from the Mayo Clinic detected abnormalities on scans up to three years before patients were diagnosed. It's being evaluated in a clinical trial.
In other words: not useful at all. (Didn’t read the article because it already misuses the AI acronym in the title, indicating it was written by some idiot with nothing to say)
In other words: not useful at all. (Didn’t read the article because it already misuses the AI acronym in the title, indicating it was written by some idiot with nothing to say)
You used the AI acronym in the same way, so I’m confused by your arrogant sounding statement
Did I though? Are they using a model with any kind of abstraction layer that actually understands relationships between objects?
Yes and yes.
These are questions that you wouldn’t have to ask if you didn’t smugly decide that you didn’t need to read before contributing your opinion.
If you can’t be arsed to read the article, here’s the peer reviewed paper in the British Medical Journal: https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.adz4433