return2ozma@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 5 days agoLeak Shows ICE Planning to Use Facial Recognition Glasses to Identify Targets in Real Timefuturism.comexternal-linkmessage-square47linkfedilinkarrow-up1291arrow-down11
arrow-up1290arrow-down1external-linkLeak Shows ICE Planning to Use Facial Recognition Glasses to Identify Targets in Real Timefuturism.comreturn2ozma@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 5 days agomessage-square47linkfedilink
minus-squareundrwater@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up45·5 days agoWill they care / understand about false positives? Not likely.
minus-squarecrandlecan@mander.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up12·5 days agoAs long as they kill p. of c., it’ll be deemed legal 🫡🤢
minus-squareLost_My_Mind@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down2·5 days agoTook me waaaaay longer than it should have to realize “p. of c.” means “people of color”. Still haven’t figured out if you’re censoring it, or if you think p. of c. is a faster way to abbriviate it. Either way, that “shorthand” is stupid, and you should just write it out.
minus-squareFlashMobOfOne@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·edit-25 days agoRemember 20 years ago when Wikileaks was telling us about all the false positives swept up in the War on Terror dragnet? Both Bush and Obama got reelected. No one at the federal level gives a shit.
Will they care / understand about false positives?
Not likely.
As long as they kill p. of c., it’ll be deemed legal 🫡🤢
Took me waaaaay longer than it should have to realize “p. of c.” means “people of color”.
Still haven’t figured out if you’re censoring it, or if you think p. of c. is a faster way to abbriviate it.
Either way, that “shorthand” is stupid, and you should just write it out.
Remember 20 years ago when Wikileaks was telling us about all the false positives swept up in the War on Terror dragnet?
Both Bush and Obama got reelected. No one at the federal level gives a shit.