Spotify and several major record labels, including UMG, Sony, and Warner, secured a $322 million default judgment against the unknown operators of Anna’s Archive. The shadow library failed to appear in court and briefly released millions of tracks that were scraped from Spotify via BitTorrent. In addition to the monetary penalty, a permanent injunction required domain registrars and other parties to suspend the site’s domain names.

  • From_D4rkness@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    99
    ·
    10 days ago

    AI still out here taking everything. Only the corporations can steal. Maybe they didn’t like that it was then given to people for free, instead sold again.

  • Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    71
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 days ago

    In addition to the damages award, Rakoff entered a permanent worldwide injunction covering ten Anna’s Archive domains

    Bahaha, Fuck Off. The world doesn’t recognize your authority.

  • ji88aja88a@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    70
    ·
    9 days ago

    does this set precedence for online platforms to sue AI platforms for all the data collection? /s

  • eleefece@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    54
    ·
    9 days ago

    So, this sentence says it’s actually illegal to download copyrighted material through shadow libraries, I get it and now I wonder what could this mean for Meta’s AI case?

    • GamingChairModel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      9 days ago

      briefly released millions of tracks that were scraped from Spotify via BitTorrent.

      That’s just an awkward sentence construction but it makes sense: they released track via Bittorrent. The tracks were scraped from Spotify.

      I sold my car that was purchased from a dealership via private party sale.

      I charged my laptop that normally accepts 100W via a 20W phone charger.

      I would’ve used a “which” phrase with commas to avoid the confusion, but the sentence as written is valid and makes sense.

    • ilinamorato@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 days ago

      Actually, for a while Spotify did use the BitTorrent protocol for content delivery. So this isn’t too far-fetched.

    • jeeva@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      …briefly released millions of tracks, scraped from Spotify, via Bittorrent.

      Would have worked better with commas, but makes sense?

  • nucleative@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    10 days ago

    A default judgement just gives Spotify some leverage to try to collect money, property, and get injunctions. But as we know from the pirate bay cases, that’s a losing whack-a-mole battle long term.

    But it does make life a bit harder for Anna’s archive unless they show up to fight back, which they probably won’t.

  • phx@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    8 days ago

    So uh, do they have a list of domains that should be blocked then? One that we can check out to… uh… ensure our kids aren’t going there and stuff.

    • FauxLiving@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 days ago

      i’m angry at them for being fucking idiots sure but like genuinely this could be a massive problem for all of us.

    • Cataphract@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 days ago

      I’m confused by your comment and several people have upvoted it so I guess I need to ask what you’re talking about. I started quoting but it’s just reposting your comment basically. Do you think Anna is the perp they’re suing? Are you saying it’s public because it’s a website and not a torrent or such? (there are like…tons of websites for streaming and downloading pirated stuff…)

      How is this a massive problem for all of us? How is this different from any other website posting pirated stuff and getting taken down/legal action against them over the past like… 2 decades? Rereading the article didn’t make anything clearer, I’m genuinely just confused on what you’re saying.

  • SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    8 days ago

    The real judgement was to force the domain registrars to comply since they have something they can take. The archive can just move to new domains.