• mrfriki@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    60
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    It’s already Saturday, I was worried there won’t be the weekly fix of miracle battery news incoming. What a relief!

  • Diplomjodler@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Nickel 63 has a half life of 100 years. So that means you have safely store these things for 500 years after using them. Yeah, sounds totally fine.

    • Rotten_potato@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      2 years ago

      Sounds very similar to the old Soviet pacemakers with radioisotope batteries. After the collapse of the Soviet Union, records about them got lost and so a bunch of people have been buried with pretty radioactive stuff in their chest. I don’t think we (as developed societies) are going to take that risk for some phone batteries…

      • NounsAndWords@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        2 years ago

        I don’t think we (as developed societies) are going to take that risk for some phone batteries…

        Not unless it’s profitable, at least…

      • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 years ago

        Yup. Not for phones, but maybe something that doesn’t require much power, and would benefit from a very long battery life.

        Maybe things like doorbells in situations where connecting them to mains electricity is too cumbersome a process.

        Or fire alarms. I know of a couple of foolish people who, when the batteries died, they didn’t bother putting new ones in.

        There are lots of possibilities for this type of battery.

  • jordanlund@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    “it says can keep a device charged for 50 years.”

    On a device that gets replaced every 1-3 years? 🤔

    Better be user replaceable or that’s a lot of energy being stored in landfills.

    • wahming@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Turning every landfill into a fission reactor is certainly one way to fix the landfill issue

    • londos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Would be cool for long term, low power devices like sensors embedded in concrete in bridges and building structures for monitoring stresses.

  • NeoNachtwaechter@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 years ago

    It’s too late for mobile devices. Everybody expects a permanent internet connection, either WiFi or mobile internet, and therefore they all need much more than some microwatts.

    However, medical implants seem appropriate.

    • Death_Equity@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 years ago

      The nuclear battery for a phone would be larger than the one in the article and likely paired with a capacitor battery. So the nuclear battery is constantly outputting 1w to a capacitor that stores energy that the device draws from.

      Phones don’t use tons of power constantly and the standby power needs are fairly low.

      • NeoNachtwaechter@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        Just calculate an average day’s energy example. Let’s say, you charge your 5000mAh battery once per day from “10%” 2,6V to “100%” 4,2V. That makes about 8Wh. So your average for the whole 24 hours is 0,3 W, or 300 mW or 300.000 μW.