‘Impossible’ to create AI tools like ChatGPT without copyrighted material, OpenAI says::Pressure grows on artificial intelligence firms over the content used to train their products

    • AntY@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      The main difference between the two in your analogy, that has great bearing on this particular problem, is that the machine learning model is a product that is to be monetized.

            • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 years ago

              I don’t think it is. We have all these non-human stuff we are awarding more rights to than we have. You can’t put a corporation in jail but you can put me in jail. I don’t have freedom from religion but a corporation does.

              • BURN@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 years ago

                Corporations are not people, and should not be treated as such.

                If a company does something illegal, the penalty should be spread to the board. It’d make them think twice about breaking the law.

                We should not be awarding human rights to non-human, non-sentient creations. LLMs and any kind of Generative AI are not human and should not in any case be treated as such.

                • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  2 years ago

                  Corporations are not people, and should not be treated as such.

                  Understand. Please tell Disney that they no longer own Mickey Mouse.

                  • BURN@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    2 years ago

                    Again, I literally already said that it’s a problem.

                    IP law is also different than granting rights to corporations. Corporations SHOULD be allowed to own IP, provided they’ve compensated the creator.

    • Exatron@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 years ago

      The difference here is that a child can’t absorb and suddenly use massive amounts of data.

        • Exatron@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 years ago

          The problem is that a human doesn’t absorb exact copies of what it learns from, and fair use doesn’t include taking entire works, shoving them in a box, and shaking it until something you want comes out.

            • Exatron@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 years ago

              Except they literally don’t. Human memory doesn’t retain an exact copy of things. Very good isn’t the same as exactly. And human beings can’t grab everything they see and instantly use it.