Broadcom CEO tells VMWare workers to ‘get butt back to office’ after completing a $69 billion merger of the two companies::In a meeting on Tuesday after completing the $69 billion merger, Broadcom CEO Hock Tan told VMWare employees their days of working remotely were over.

    • echo64@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      66
      ·
      2 years ago

      It will. This is just more layoffs disguised as back to office. They’ll lose a bunch of good workers, but they bought VMware for the customer base, not the workers.

      America needs to start fighting for worker rights, it’s just sad how little they have.

      • Zoboomafoo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        They’ll lose a bunch of good workers

        You’re looking at it from the wrong angle: They’re ditching anyone that won’t lick boots

      • namingthingsiseasy@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 years ago

        They’ll lose a bunch of good workers, but they bought VMware for the customer base, not the workers.

        Yeah, vmware has a pretty good stranglehold on companies using on-premises hardware.

        My last job was like this. We had basically 2 sysadmins (now 1) that managed hundreds of servers for about 30+ research scientists. There was no way in hell that people were going to adopt kubernetes (nobody in the entire team had any expertise in containerization, let alone k8s), IaaS was too expensive for their meager budgets, and it’s not like anyone is going to switch virtualization vendors.

        So anyway, the writing is clearly on the wall for them. Pretty soon, you can be sure that the prices are going to get cranked waayyyy up. Current vmware customers will likely find themselves in a pretty unfortunate position soon.

        Oh well. But this is what happens when you depend too much on commercial vendors.

      • Wodge@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 years ago

        Since they already deal with a fair few of VMware’s customers themselves, I’d say they probably bought VMW to bolster it’s software offerings. They seem to be wanting to get rid of a lot of the staff there, so customers tend to build relationships with their vendors, and burning those bridges ain’t going to help there.

  • nucleative@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    2 years ago

    Either they’ve already inked special exceptions with their top talent, or those guys are about to leave.

    Can’t imagine it’s too big a pool of engineers at the very top of virtualization technology.

    • Zeth0s@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      On the other hand, they must think VMware portfolio is a rather stable set of solutions, while the bulk of innovation is moving towards kubernetes like solutions that they don’t want to follow, as they are late and don’t want to invest to build the know how.

      They are considering to transform the business model more like oracle, sap, cisco, where the core business is sales not innovation. Their plan is probably that they have such a strong position in the market that talents are not needed, just average people who can patch out stuff somehow.

      I have too much technical experience to agree with them that this is a good call. I believe it will be a disaster on the long run. But their background is clearly different, and they saw on the market a huge amount of successful companies with such business model. First among all pre-nadella Microsoft.

      • grayman@lemmy.worldBanned from community
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 years ago

        They’ll squeeze 5 years of blood from entrenched customers. That’s enough of a win.

    • ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      2 years ago

      Because they don’t see them as people, they see them as disposable assets and resources.

      • grayman@lemmy.worldBanned from community
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 years ago

        Sloan School of Business… Every worker is a cog. Every worker must have a very narrow job to ensure replaceability and low wages.

        VMware is on death row.

        • ragepaw@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 years ago

          VMware is not on death row. VMware is already dead. It no longer exists. All that’s left is an entity possessing its corpse.

          • grayman@lemmy.worldBanned from community
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            Fair argument. The brain is dead but the body is still animated. Roting parts will start to fall off soon.

    • ohlaph@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 years ago

      That way of treating the younger generation won’t fly. The boomers put up with it, even some gen x. But the millennials and zoomers are all about workers rights. This dude is about to find out.

        • ohlaph@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 years ago

          And they will, but a huge difference in innovation when the majority don’t want to be there. Quality will probably start to dip first. Then attrition will rise slowly. It won’t happen over night butbas the market improves, the bleeding will begin.

  • arin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    2 years ago

    So time to devalue their company after purchasing? Aiming for tax writeoffs?

    • 131sean131@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Literally trying to get people to quit so they don’t have to fire them because it is more expensive.