• dm_me_your_feet@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    2 years ago

    I’m sceptical. With all the added complexity of a foldable, the specs are probably gonna be below average to absymal. I’d love to be proven wrong tho.

      • sugartits@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        34
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        2 years ago

        Is that before or after you remove all the extra crap that Samsung shovel on it?

        • Telodzrum@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          23
          ·
          2 years ago

          2015 called, they want their talking points back.

          Seriously though, Samsung has a sleeker Android than even Google in 2023. You have to get an AOSP or similar os on a device to beat it. It’s been a long road, but the One UI is just better.

          • sugartits@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            How many duplicated apps are installed on modern Samsung’s?

            How many browsers? How many app stores? How many games?

            • Hexarei@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              2 years ago

              Here’s all the Samsung stuff on my Galaxy Fold 4, two of which aren’t ones that it came with:

              It’s really not a problem nor that bad. I chucked them into a folder and have only touched them to use the files app or manage Good Lock.

              • sugartits@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                2 years ago

                So if we’re including what Google gives us, that’s two app stores, Two browsers, Two note takers. Two messaging apps. Stuff for Samsung TV, Smart things, both useless to me. HP printing app for some reason. Samsung “news” (lol). AR zone (whatever the fuck that is).

                I wonder how bloated the launcher is…

                Literally none of that ads any value to a “stock Google Android” installation. It’s all bloat and crap. Arguably even the stock experience is not bloat free; this just makes it much worse.

                And that’s only the stuff you see. God knows what other services and background shit is also running, sucking up resources and your battery life.

                Yeah, it’s no better than it used to be. The talking point is still relevant and any assertion to the contrary is invalid.

                • Hexarei@programming.dev
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  2 years ago

                  I don’t consider it bloat. Bloat is preinstalled games or adware, not useful services. Everything preinstalled besides Samsung’s stuff was removable, and all of that at least does have a use, and works for what it’s supposed to do.

                  • Browser is a browser. It functions as such for people who don’t care about which browser they’re using.
                  • Note taking app does what it says on the tin.
                  • messaging app is the SMS app. It didn’t come with another one, I installed the one from Google myself for RCS.
                  • Samsung TV Plus is actually for watching TV networks, and it’s free. Works decently even.
                  • smart things is useful for anyone who has Samsung iot devices. The oven in the house I rent actually is one, which was funny to me.
                  • HP printing might have actually been one I added… For my HP network printer.

                  All of that aside, my Z Fold 4 is plenty powerful such that I never experience lagging or slowdowns. My battery rarely goes below 50% with 4-5 hours of screen on time daily. So if there’s background stuff, it’s not affecting either of the things you would expect it to.

                  The launcher is fine. No “news section” off to the side like the old Pixel launcher used to have, no frills or extras or adware in your face… it’s fine. The only complaint I have about the launcher is that I can’t make my app drawer continuously scroll. However, it provides the service for the ‘taskbar’ at the bottom of my screen: and I use it a lot for multitasking so I can’t get rid of it.

                  Honestly, from my perspective none of it is problematic. It sounds to me like you’re just hating on something to hate on it, none of those extra things being installed cause me any inconvenience. In the slightest.

                  Calling someone’s opinion on such a subjective matter invalid really speaks to your thoughts on other people. Are you ok? Need to talk about it?

  • TwoBeeSan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    Have been using the flip 3 for a couple years.

    I love the small design. Is it a Gimmick? Yeah probably. Do I like that Gimmick? Absolutely. It would he difficult to go back to a big ass phone. Routinely carry it at work by the ring on the case. Removes my need for a watch since I can easily reply or answer when it’s closed, control media, etc.

    Love to see more unique smart phone options. The phones were too samey for too long. This budget option could help that innovation even more.

    • sucricdrawkcab@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      I was looking at the bigger foldables and came to the reality I don’t need it. Ended up getting a RAZR+. I’ll never be able to go back to a full size phone now because of the size. I’ve just gotten used to using the outer screen and hope this size keeps getting better.

    • lorty@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Same here. I don’t understand why everyone in this thread is talking about cracks and creases after it was fixed in the generations following the first.

  • Dasnap@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Every person I’ve known who has owned a foldable has had it eventually break because of the fold. We try to keep moving mechanical parts out of tech for a reason. I’ve never had a smartphone ‘suddenly break’ like a printer or car.

    • 𝔼𝕩𝕦𝕤𝕚𝕒@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 years ago

      The glass “runs out” of flexs.

      I’ve had 2 for a year each and no major issues. Now that this one is just out of warranty and working towards year 2 guess I’ll see. I love the sheer size of the screen so much.

    • echo64@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      This might be a bias. I’ve had a foldable for two and a bit years now, no issues aside from I hate the camera, but that’s always been a constant

      • firadin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        How do you use it as a laptop replacement? What tasks are you doing on it that would otherwise be done on a laptop? I feel like its too small, it would only replace phone tasks for me.

    • Mr_Dr_Oink@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 years ago

      Whilst i might be biased, my samsung fold 3 has been fine for 2 years. My mum and step dad have had the flip 2 and 4, a colleague at work has a gold 4 and two colleagues at qork have a fold 5 each.

      No issues at all.

      I would argue that you have also formed a bias based on people you know who perhaps dont take care of their insanely expensive phones.

      Although saying that, I’ve dropped mine multiple times, onto wood flooring, ceramic tiles, and tarmac (i practically threw it onto the tarmac when something scared me). Amd all it auffered was a few scratches and dents on the edges. Both screens are absolutely fine.

      • Zikeji@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        I gifted my mom my Flip 3 when I migrated off (I couldn’t tolerate the cameras on it). She only broke it once early on by dropping it with the screen open, but that’s what the accidental protection is for. Other than that, she uses it daily and it still is going strong.

    • Kadath (she/her)@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      2 years ago

      I am typing this on my pristine Fold 3.

      Purchased it on day one and had it for a more than two years by now. The phone is as spotless as the day I got it. I open and close it constantly.

      Stop spreading FUD.

    • GeekySalsa@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      I’ve had my fold 3 for over two years and it’s still perfectly fine and I’ve dropped it quite a bit. I even dropped it hard once on asphalt while biking full speed. Tbh I got lucky with that last one, but still, these phones are plenty durable.

    • Dr. Moose@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 years ago

      The current foldable prices seem very artificial. We know how much screen panels cost and it definitely doesn’t double the cost of production. Its kinda weird to think that all these foldables conspired around same price point but it’s not impossible that they are just following one another.

      • danielfgom@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 years ago

        I would guess that this cheaper model won’t have any outer display and maybe the inner display might be LCD instead of OLED. And of course the CPU will be Snapdragon 7 series, which is fine

        Apart from that I don’t see where else they could save costs.

        I agree that the prices are inflated just because it’s something new and novel.

  • daltotron@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    I think this would be awesome if they used the same aspect ratio paper does, 1 to 1.414, so you could open the phone and have a phone in the same aspect ratio but larger. You know, if we’re going to keep having nonsense screen aspect ratios where you can’t watch any videos without black bars or zoom, you might as well do something fun with it.

    Edit: it’s also really stupid that we’ve seen phones go from being folding, to smartphones, to slowly getting larger and taller over the years, to the point where now people are jonesing for this simply so they can have a more compact phone again. I doubt for most usage you’re going to use the inner screen at all, there’s pretty limited potential there in what you’re watching and doing. Watching a video is probably gonna hit you with omega black bars. Only way I see this making any sense is if you have a classic square to real phone clamshell design, GBA style rather than DS style, but that still doesn’t make that much sense to me.

  • deddit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    I wonder what adds and software they will try and force on the user.