Lots of venture capital money behind it. I wonder how quickly the enshitification will begin.

  • stormio@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    ·
    2 months ago

    Plus, Rose suggests Digg could use signals acquired from mobile devices to help verify members — for instance, the app could identify when Digg users attended a meetup in the same location.

    Maybe I’m being paranoid, but this does not sound like a good thing for privacy.

    • Trilogy3452@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      “Hi! We’ve just noticed there are 2 other members of d/footfettish next to you, go say hi!”

    • scarabic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      You are absolutely right about that. Passively detecting your location? Fuck that. We are getting into an era where bots are overwhelming and user verification is a valid topic to discuss. I think additional device permissions can be one element in that discussion. But this idea he popped off the dome is a miserable example of such.

  • FinishingDutch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Yeah… no. None of that sounds appealing.

    ‘Curbing toxicity with AI’ means a bot is going to ban you because it doesn’t recognise sarcasm.

    And ‘new tech to verify your identity’ sounds like a privacy violation at best.

    ‘Verifying that you own a product before they let you post in its community’ is a complete lack of understanding of how people use places like this.

    Digg can fuck right off.

    • NateNate60@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      2 months ago

      While AI obviously is not perfect and is flawed in many ways, having AI sift through the torrent of comments and then flag problematic submissions for human review is likely going to be extremely effective with minimal false positives. Though I do say this as a person whose Reddit account is currently banned for 3 days for “inciting violence” because of a knife-based joke.

    • pool_spray_098@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 months ago

      Yeah, the verifying that you own a product thing is so dumb.

      “Hey <insert product> community. I’m thinking about purchasing <insert product>, but I wanted to know if it can do X, Y, and Z.”

      “your post has been deleted because you have not proven that you own <insert product>.”

      Wow, it’s like they made Reddit even worse.

  • meejle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    2 months ago

    I really wanted to like it, but it’s already a right-wing cesspit. 🤷‍♂️ Maaaaaybe it’ll improve, now that it’s public, but I don’t have high hopes.

    I know this place is just the opposite kind of echo chamber, but when the other option is being beaten over the head with transphobia and Maga shit, ehh, I’ll take it.

  • Kintarian@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    2 months ago

    We left Digg for Reddit, then they enshitified Reddit so we went to the fediverse and now they want to bring Digg back. The turd just circles the toilet bowl endlessly.

  • Boiglenoight@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    2 months ago

    Someone will have to let me know because I’m not wasting my time there. I’m going to keep wasting my time here. It’s a fantastic waste of time

  • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    2 months ago

    Ooohhh a venture capitalist social media platform! I wonder how and in how many overly creative and putrid ways that site will try and fuck me over, inside and out.

    Yeah, hells no

    • T156@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      Wasn’t a lot of their tomfoolery why people relocated to Reddit to begin with?

    • Kushan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 months ago

      Superior technology does not necessarily mean a superior product. History has plenty of examples where the inferior technology won out because the majority of people don’t care about having the best or most advanced technology, they want the easiest, cheapest and (most importantly) lowest effort.

      To be clear, I don’t think digg is a superior product either, I’m just saying that how good the tech is matters far less than people want to believe. What truly matters is the implementation.