• @GissaMittJobb@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1124 hours ago

    It’s extremely frustrating to read this comment thread because it’s obvious that so many of you didn’t actually read the article, or even half-skim the article, or even attempted to even comprehend the title of the article for more than a second.

    For shame.

    • @LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      218 hours ago

      “While the copies used to convert purchased print library copies into digital library copies were slightly disfavored by the second factor (nature of the work), the court still found “on balance” that it was a fair use because the purchased print copy was destroyed and its digital replacement was not redistributed.”

      So you find this to be valid? To me it is absolutely being redistributed