There were a number of exciting announcements from Apple at WWDC 2024, from macOS Sequoia to Apple Intelligence. However, a subtle addition to Xcode 16 — the development environment for Apple platforms, like iOS and macOS — is a feature called Predictive Code Completion. Unfortunately, if you bought into Apple’s claim that 8GB of unified memory was enough for base-model Apple silicon Macs, you won’t be able to use it. There’s a memory requirement for Predictive Code Completion in Xcode 16, and it’s the closest thing we’ll get from Apple to an admission that 8GB of memory isn’t really enough for a new Mac in 2024.

  • @Jtee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    554 months ago

    And now all the fan boys and girls will go out and buy another MacBook. That’s planned obsolescence for ya

    • m-p{3}
      link
      fedilink
      English
      134 months ago

      And why they solder the RAM, or even worse make it part of the SoC.

      • @rockSlayer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        284 months ago

        There are real world performance benefits to ram being as close as possible to the CPU, so it’s not entirely without merit. But that’s what CAMM modules are for.

        • @TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          34 months ago

          Apple’s SoC long predates CAMM.

          Dell first showed off CAMM in 2022, and it only became JEDEC standardised in December 2023.

          That said, if Dell can create a really good memory standard and get JEDEC to make it an industry standard, so can Apple. They just chose not to.

        • umami_wasabi
          link
          fedilink
          English
          44 months ago

          Well. The claim they made still holds true, despit how I dislike this design choice. It is faster, and more secure (though attacks on NAND chips are hard and require high skill levels that most attacker won’t posses).

          And add one more: it saves power when using LPDDR5 rather DDR5. To a laptop that battery life matters a lot, I agree that’s important. However, I have no idea how much standby or active time it gain by using LPDDR5.

      • Balder
        link
        fedilink
        English
        4
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        In this particular case the RAM is part of the chip as an attempt to squeeze more performance. Nowadays, processors have become too fast but it’s useless if the rest of the components don’t catch up. The traditional memory architecture has become a bottleneck the same way HDDs were before the introduction of SSDs.

        You’ll see this same trend extend to Windows laptops as they shift to Snapdragon processors too.

        • @stoly@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          34 months ago

          People do like to downplay this, but SoC is the future. There’s no way to get performance over a system bus anymore.

    • @Mongostein@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      54 months ago

      And the apple haters will keep making this exact same comment on every post using their 3rd laptop in ten years while I’m still using my 2014 MacBook daily with no issues.

      Be more original.

      • @stoly@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        14 months ago

        This is pretty much it. People really just want to find reasons to hate Apple over the past 2 - 3 years. You’re right, though, your Mac can run easily for 10+ years. You’re good basically until the web browsers no longer support your OS version, which is more in the 12-15 year range.

      • @Jtee@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        34 months ago

        Nice attempt to justify planned obsolescence. To think apple hasn’t done this time and time again, you’d have to be a fool