paraphrand

Downvotes? Use your words.

If this is a scam or indicative of evil, etc, it deserves upvotes. Otherwise it sort of looks like plugging your ears, guys.

It’s always an “it’s inevitable” argument.

When detection was added to the Apple Watch, I was notified after the first month of analysis. And went to the doctor.

It got me on the right track, and a year later I’ve gone down to minimal medication for it. I might be off of it completely sometime next year.

Is it just open weights again?

booo

There are crazy people who believe they can just real time hallucinate consistent and fun video games without actually building real games.

Google has already put out multiple demonstrations of early versions.

I’m skeptical they will ever make them have grounded world interactions, collision or consistency over time. I’m also skeptical they will ever be cost effective to run.

But yeah, this is one possibility.

Yeah, for sure. But I think we both know how some technology manages to stick around surprisingly long.

Even so, this is different. Spectrum use is a different animal from fax machines, COBOL and Windows CE.

I think things like commercial and high end home automation. And security stuff. I might be mistaken tho.

And it might sound like that’s old and out of date. But it stuck around cuz it was reliable.

I see. Yeah, I think the problem is that they can’t insulate themselves from the overall production timeline constraints. Because even if their chips are unique, they don’t have their own private production lines. They only get a share of available production capacity.

And as I understand it. Buying out a memory production facility is something they are not interested in. They don’t want to be in that part of the supply chain. And getting in now, only for memory supply chain constraints to go back to “normal” in 2 years isn’t a strategy they want to take.

Apple would rather have a diverse supply chain, and have the ability to pit different vendors against each other.

Some of this is similar to why just building a new facility isn’t a solution in the near term either. Because by the time it’s online, the situation is likely to have passed. And then you are back in a commodity market that’s historically difficult to compete in.

Yes, you are missing something. You are assuming they get their memory from a different supplier than the rest of the industry.

For some reason lots of people assume this.

I dunno. Plenty of people have gotten in serious trouble for just accessing publicly reachable data and systems. And this was without identifying themselves as someone else or acting as someone else.

I wonder if the courts would agree with you. I don’t think “your lock was shitty” will hold up in court.

Maybe this is one of those cases where every single user of the software is liable since they are the one accessing the computer systems? But the software creator isn’t? I dunno.

This is just a comment on accessing computer systems. Not a comment on 3D printers or Louis.

I don’t want to know who you are. But I want to peer into your soul via machine learning techniques.

Well, the perf of these devices will be barely acceptable, then.

They vibe code Claude code. So I can see why.

Requiring a second computer to use your computer 😩.

People would enjoy these features. But they want it to happen without a camera, somehow.

So they are supposedly verboten features. Never to be done.

It’s coming back up. But the university I’m involved with needs to fix their federated login systems now.

And who knows if they actually patched the flaw and if it’ll be hit again.

Thanks for the wiki link.

Hell yeah. Battery reuse is the cyberpunk future we actually need.