And the best part is, it’s not actually complex or expensive technology. Essentially it’s a big box with crushed stone in it.

Well, alright 😃

Ascorbic acid has two enantiomers. Only one of them is “vitamin C”. I’m not sure if this is what she’s referring to, though.

In another interview (in French, sorry), when talking about beta-carotene, she says that a substance isolated from its natural environment (other molecules, cells, etc.) and replaced with a pure, synthetic version could have very different biological properties.

Honestly, I think we still know very little about this. This research is about strong statistical associations. A lot more research is needed to understand the exact biological processes.

Here’s the press release from INSERM, which is likely a better source: https://presse.inserm.fr/en/colorants-conservateurs-trois-nouvelles-etudes-pointent-des-liens-entre-additifs-alimentaires-et-risque-accru-de-cancer-de-maladies-cardiovasculaires-et-dhypertension/72881/

Reading the paper, exercise alone had no effect on these “biological clocks”. So, the results are promising, but given the lackluster results of the trial on other outcomes (blood pressure, mortality, falls, etc.), I’d be cautious before jumping to conclusions.

I think the main question is how exercise alone compares to exercise +supplements. If I have time later I’ll try to dig into the paper.

Can we stop calling it a “mission”? This is an expensive vacation for billionaires, not a scientific endeavor.

I don’t understand why they don’t use a second model to detect falsehoods instead of trying to fix it in the original LLM?

I wonder what the impact on piracy will be? It’s probably harder to rip streaming services than it is to rip blu-rays…

As an AI model, I cannot answer duplicate questions. Please check this completely unrelated question instead.