TBF, the law as stated says a refund is acceptable. It does not say if the refund is at original purchase price or current price. It should be whichever price is higher, else the consumer could be at a loss depending on the circumstances.

I can’t speak for the latter part, but the former is doable. Assuming you actually want to spend a full 24 hours driving. I say this as someone who did nearly exactly one third the distance in one third the time. Depends on your car of course and if you can fast charge. The real world range on mine ended up being a bit less than 200 miles (260 EPA range) going just over 80MPH in Texas, and it had fast charging capabilities.

That said, I wouldn’t recommend it in the vehicle I used. Really need more like 300+ range to make it decent. Cause I had to fully charge at times to make it to the next fast charger and a full charge is at least twice as long as a quick charge, which is typically going from 20% to 80%. Longer range means mostly only having to charge to 80%. That saves a bunch of time.

Typical degradation at 7 years wouldn’t be bad, but with the type of driving you do I expect the degradation will be worse.

Good genes. That seems to play the biggest role.

What they say about it means nothing. Why would they say anything else?

#16 must be in every super glue I use. Best use has been to remove the outer layer of my fingers.

It says you’ll only be able to download stuff from their store.

EDIT: I should have specified that I was talking about the new fire stick. Not whatever they plan to do with existing ones.

I don’t stream anything illegal but I have had to sideload a couple of things that weren’t available to download for whatever reason. I’m not going to give up that ability.

It’s one thing if it was never available because they didn’t want to put in the work. I’m talking very generically here, not about Android or the Fire Stick in particular. Like, no one is really going to be upset that something like an MP3 player or a DVD player can’t run whatever software you want. But if your company is intentionally removing such functionality, you can fuck right off. Greed is the only reason to do it.

It uses 1% of the energy but is still 1000x faster than our current fastest cards? Yea, I’m calling bullshit. It’s either a one off, bullshit, or the next industrial revolution.

EDIT: Also, why do articles insist on using ##x less? You can just say it uses 1% of the energy. It’s so much easier to understand.

There are too many instances of this to keep track of. They need a better vetting process.

I don’t want to agree to all of their cookies to read the article. Is this yet another IV doc that used his own sperm?

I thought that’s what softcore porn is for.

By my calculations, I have the brain of a 172 year old.

Good eyes?

Wonder if they even felt the slap on the wrist.

What savage puts avocado in a food bowl… but leaves it in the skin?

Forbidden sprinkles.

Everyone disliked that